Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Discouraging approaches: Difference between revisions

:* the only interesting comment on standards compliance is one offered by a widely used linter,

:* and the only creative and Rosetta-like comment on an approach with which we disagree is simply the submission of an alternative draft.

 

In terms of Rosetta's goals, some drafts will emphasise universal similarities, and others will emphasise particular differences.

 

There are other forums for the pursuit of such arguments.

 

Does that seem to make sense ?