Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Discouraging approaches: Difference between revisions
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Discouraging approaches (view source)
Revision as of 02:09, 18 January 2022
, 2 years agono edit summary
m (RC is not a vehicle for "encouraging" or "discouraging" particular approaches. There are other forums for that.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3:
|summary=The goals of Rosetta Code, and responding to code which we disapprove of.
}}
The landing page defines the goals of Rosetta Code in terms of:
# demonstrating "how languages are similar and different"
Line 9 ⟶ 8:
So what happens when approaches to problem
My view is that diverging approaches are the life-blood of Rosetta Code, and that the creative response to difference is simply to submit alternative drafts.
Line 32 ⟶ 31:
All drafts provide interesting insight into differing approaches, and the optimisation of different types of value.
I don't think we should be vandalising or deleting each others (working and well-linted) code in the angry pursuit of personal visions of what is "to be encouraged" or what is "not be encouraged".
There are other forums for the pursuit of such arguments.
Line 40 ⟶ 39:
[[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 12:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
: I think so, though I have not thought through all of the possibilities. Or, from my perspective: it might be that there could be examples where other issues become significant. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 02:09, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
| |||