Rosetta Code:Village Pump/DB vs Programming Languages: Difference between revisions

Line 13:
: It's a mess. It's a lot less messy than it was. Assistance with doing this is welcome.
: That said, there are languages which embed database access in more deeply than others, even if we don't yet have examples of them (I'm thinking of MUMPS here) so I'd like to avoid requiring SQL for the "database" tasks if not strictly necessary. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 07:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 
:: Hmm, perhaps add f.ex. MUMPS as a DB *and* a Programming language then?
:: I think it'd be practical, as everything else is redundant.. Copy paste would be the preferred tools for people writing database queries... :P
:: --[[User:LordMike|LordMike]] 07:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Anonymous user