Rosetta Code:Village Pump/DB vs Programming Languages: Difference between revisions
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/DB vs Programming Languages (view source)
Revision as of 14:42, 18 April 2010
, 14 years agoCareful.
(Careful.) |
|||
Line 17:
:: I think it'd be practical, as everything else is redundant.. Copy paste would be the preferred tools for people writing database queries... :P
:: --[[User:LordMike|LordMike]] 07:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
: I'd be careful lumping DB languages together, or even SQL variants. DB2 code entirely directly compatible with MSSQL, which isn't entirely compatible with MySQL, etc. Also, there's a relationship with declarative languages in there that I haven't quite figured out yet. Some languages support the same basic query concepts, but use ''very'' different syntax. (The last time I played with Access, for example, the queries reminded me of bangpaths.)
: Most of it (DB2 vs MSSQL vs MySQL, for example) could be handled with liberal application of the workswith template, but better tracking of support might require something akin to the Library template. Also, the stored procedure languages are a different beast, entirely. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 14:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
| |||