Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Crafting short checklists: Difference between revisions

m
formatting edit
No edit summary
m (formatting edit)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3:
|summary=Checklists improve airline safety and reduce mortality in thoracic surgery. They could facilitate excellence on Rosetta Code, but would need to be short.
}}
{{#ask:[[Is village pump topic::true]]
|?Summary
|?Modification date
|format=broadtable
|limit=20
|order=DESC
|sort=Modification date
|searchlabel=Older topics...
|offset=0
}}
 
Two points emerge from an absorbing book by a US heart surgeon, Atul Gawunde, who studied Boeing's checklist development process ("The Checklist Manifesto – how to get things right"):
:# A good checklist can make a surprising amount of difference – raising quality, preventing problems and saving time.
Line 24 ⟶ 13:
The [[Rosetta_Code|3 core goals of Rosetta Code]] are of course:
 
:# To '''present solutions to the same task in as many different languages as possible''',
:# to '''demonstrate how languages are similar and different''', and
:# to '''aid a person with a grounding in one approach to a problem in learning another'''.
 
A suggestion: I think it could be tremendously helpful, and make consistent excellence of this remarkable learning resource very much easier to achieve, if we were to prepare 3 short pre-flights checklists – one each for:
9,655

edits