Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Bash examples: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Highlighter oversupport.)
No edit summary
Line 10:
::::::: ... [[wp:Almquist_shell|Interesting]] and creating confusion... but from a syntax-HLing point of view, it is not a problem, I believe a bash-syntax-HLer highlights well also ash/dash/sh; handling them as aliases? --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 14:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
:::::::: The question is whether or not it's appropriate for the highlighter to imply support for keywords and other functionality that aren't in the language being highlighted. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 16:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
::::::: Back to the question about lumping '''tcsh''' with '''csh'''. Was anything ever decided about this? IIRC, almost all the differences between the two were in interactive behavior. I don't think I've ever written a '''csh''' script that had to be modified to run in '''tcsh'''. It seems to me that it would be considerably safer to put '''csh''' and '''tcsh''' together than to put the POSIX umbrella shells together. --[[User:Balrog|Balrog]] 00:24, 28 May 28 2009 (UTC)
Anonymous user