Rosetta Code:Add a Task: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Need discussion of task syntax.) |
(→Task focus inclusion: Solidify langauge) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
===Task focus inclusion=== |
===Task focus inclusion=== |
||
Generally speaking, the goal is to address a problem a programmer may face or want to think about. |
Generally speaking, the goal is to address a problem a programmer may face or want to think about. These include (but aren't strictly limited to): |
||
* Practical problems |
|||
* Problems which demonstrate concepts |
|||
* Simple entertainment. |
|||
As for discouraged areas, remember that Rosetta Code is a tool of education, not a code repository. "Code golf", or the finding of the absolute most succinct expression of a solution as its own goal, is rarely idiomatic or practical use of the languages in question, and so is also difficult to justify in a demonstrative context. |
|||
The common theme across all tasks must be increasing competence and understanding of the tools in question, by example or by annotated counterexample if necessary. |
|||
===Task focus exclusion=== |
===Task focus exclusion=== |
||
As languages are the richest resource of comparison on Rosetta Code, a task should not be so specific as to invoke a particular language as being the only one allowed to solve a task. A task should also not be so specific with its other requirements that there is only one language capable of solving it. Best-effort solutions ("this isn't exactly possible in Ayrch, but something practical solving the language's idiomatic analog would be") are often fine, so a task writer may find that styles "use technique X to solve problem" and "solve problem using technique X" may need to be interchanged to make a useful number of solutions possible. |
As languages are the richest resource of comparison on Rosetta Code, a task should not be so specific as to invoke a particular language as being the only one allowed to solve a task. A task should also not be so specific with its other requirements that there is only one language capable of solving it. Best-effort solutions ("this isn't exactly possible in Ayrch, but something practical solving the language's idiomatic analog would be") are often fine, so a task writer may find that styles "use technique X to solve problem" and "solve problem using technique X" may need to be interchanged to make a useful number of solutions possible. |