Anonymous user
Numeric error propagation: Difference between revisions
m
added an HTML (in-line) comment explaining a glyph substitution due to a design flaw in the OVERLINE text-decoration.
No edit summary |
m (added an HTML (in-line) comment explaining a glyph substitution due to a design flaw in the OVERLINE text-decoration.) |
||
Line 26:
# Print and display both <big> '''d''' </big> and its error.
<!-- the superscript
2 glyph [²]
had to be used instead of the
<sup>2</sup>
notation which causes the overline "text-decoration" to either overlay the superscript or it causes a "break" in the continuous overline part of the radic. Gerard Schildberger. -->
;References:
| |||