Miller–Rabin primality test: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(→‎Python: Proved correct up to large N: Reword, and mention that this uses an old paper and we know better results.)
m (→‎{{header|REXX}}: re-introduced whitespace.)
Line 2,734: Line 2,734:


=={{header|REXX}}==
=={{header|REXX}}==
With a K of 1, there seems to be a not uncommon number of failures, but
With a   K   of   1,   there seems to be a not uncommon number of failures, but
: with a K ≥ 2, the failures are rare,
::: with a   K ≥ 2,   the failures are rare,
: with a K ≥ 3, rare as hen's teeth.
::: with a   K ≥ 3,   rare as hen's teeth.


This would be in the same vein as:
This would be in the same vein as: