Inverted syntax: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
m (→‎{{header|Phix}}: (two step process))
m (→‎{{header|Phix}}: in fact recreating)
Line 903: Line 903:
<!--</lang>-->
<!--</lang>-->
I should note that "if length(cl)>2 then" gets away by the skin of its teeth and would break were it written "if length(cl) > 2 then".<br>
I should note that "if length(cl)>2 then" gets away by the skin of its teeth and would break were it written "if length(cl) > 2 then".<br>
... and here is the original, which can be used to first create and then re-run to compile/run the above, albeit destroying/restoring it in the latter process.
... and here is the original, which can be used to first create and then re-run to compile/run the above, in fact destroying/restoring/recreating it in the latter process.
<!--<lang Phix>(notonline)-->
<!--<lang Phix>(notonline)-->
<span style="color: #000080;font-style:italic;">-- demo\rosetta\inverted_syntax.exw</span>
<span style="color: #000080;font-style:italic;">-- demo\rosetta\inverted_syntax.exw</span>