Help talk:Syntax Highlighting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Assembly Languages: new section) |
(→Assembly Languages: Add missing sig for Alt and a probably not very helpful reply) |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
asm would then be extended with additional instructions by each different assembly language. There should be a standard format for them, such as asm_MIPS, asm_ARM, etc. Unrecongised lang tags should default to asm if their specific tag doesn't exist (if that's also possible). |
asm would then be extended with additional instructions by each different assembly language. There should be a standard format for them, such as asm_MIPS, asm_ARM, etc. Unrecongised lang tags should default to asm if their specific tag doesn't exist (if that's also possible). |
||
</ol> |
</ol> |
||
--[[User:Alt|Alt]] ([[User talk:Alt|talk]]) 04:36, 16 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:This page links to [[Rosetta_Code:Village_Pump/Syntax_Highlighting#Relationship_Between_Rosetta_Code_and_GeSHi|a note on the relationship between Rosetta Code and GeSHi]] which to me indicates that you may need to talk to the GeSHi project if you want changes made. (I'm not certain tho.) —[[User:dchapes|dchapes]] ([[User talk:dchapes|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/dchapes|contribs]]) 16:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||