Cross compilation: Difference between revisions

The compiler tries hard to avoid emitting unnecessary binary, which is likely to be more successful when those routines are used as plainly as possible, without any and/or parts to the conditional. Likewise #ilASM{} aka inline assembly can contain guards

such as [32] to emit (only) the relevant code for different target architectures, see

 

The requires() routine can help ensure time is not needlessly wasted trying to get things to work on

platform(s) where it currently simply does not.

 

compiler directive "with javascript_semantics" explicitly stating that is possible, and the "without"

variant explicitly blocking it, with similar implications as requires().