Continued fraction: Difference between revisions
m
→{{header|NetRexx}}: mention better computation at Rexx
m (→{{header|C++}}) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) m (→{{header|NetRexx}}: mention better computation at Rexx) |
||
Line 555:
Apparently the coefficients given in the task description are only good for an approxunation.
One should, therefore, not SHOW more that 15 digits. See http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreiszahl
See Rexx for a better computation
=={{header|PARI/GP}}==
| |||