Anonymous user
Category talk:Unicon: Difference between revisions
→Works With (To Use or Not To Use)
m (→Template/ How to write up Icon and Unicon markup: -workswith) |
|||
Line 143:
The needs improvement tag can be used to mark possible improvements and give a reason.
<pre><nowiki>{{improve|Unicon|The example is correct; however, Unicon implemented additional graphical features and a better example may be possible.}}</nowiki></pre>
==== Works With (
The works with macro provides standard text. '''Beyond that I'm not sure what advantage it has with regard to indexes or special pages?'''
<pre><nowiki>{{works with|Unicon}}</nowiki></pre>
'''If you are cleaning up the Icon/Unicon headers, please don't remove
:You definitely don't need the works with template if you're using the header template for both language names. The header templates will add the task to the language categories. The works with template will only link back to the Unicon page (already linked to by the header). --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 16:39, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
::Thanks for clearing this up. However, the task count on most linked to pages dropped when works with was used instead of a header. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 17:21, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
The template suggests this may be incorrect usage, see [[Template:Works_with]]. Specifically it says "Do not use this template to merely indicate what language implementation you used, ''but only if the example relies on features only a particular implementation/variant has.''"
I really don't know what goes on behind the scene with this.
: For now I am including it in the template. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 03:11, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
:: It's now been removed from the template. I guess I have some cleanup to do (A-J entries). --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 17:21, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
--[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 15:53, 31 December 2010
=== Template for new tasks ===
| |||