Anonymous user
Category talk:Unicon: Difference between revisions
m
→Template/ How to write up Icon and Unicon markup: more
(→Level of detail where Icon and Unicon are different: other variants Jcon, Object Icon) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 201:
: Conversion to this format is ongoing and proceeding alphabetically --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 14:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
=== Note on templates for other variants ===
I've stubbed in categories for [[Jcon]] and [[ObjectIcon]]; however, there are no code examples for either at this time. If you plan on adding them please add the code as per the templates in the sections below using a single Icon/Jcon/ObjectIcon/Unicon header like one of these (assuming all examples are present):
<pre><nowiki>
=={{header|Icon}}, {{header|Jcon}}, {{header|ObjectIcon}}, and {{header|Unicon}}==
</nokiki></pre>
=== Template/ How to write up Icon and Unicon markup ===
Line 225 ⟶ 232:
{{libheader|Unicon Code Library}}
Output:<pre>sample output</pre></nowiki></pre>▼
▲sample output</nowiki></pre>
The second case is where Icon and Unicon examples are ''significantly'' different. In this case the difference will be visually obvious in task indices.
Line 249 ⟶ 254:
{{libheader|Unicon Code Library}}
Output:<pre>sample output</pre></nowiki></pre>▼
▲sample output</nowiki></pre>
In the third case, only one solution is presented. At this time it is unlikely there will be an Icon only case. Unicon only solutions should be presented as shown below. If it is the case that the solution isn't possible in Icon then an omit template should be coded as well. Using this structure will keep the look and feel of the task index, be properly reflected in tasks implemented/not implemented on the language category page, and allow someone to provide an Icon solution at a later date with minimal modification by converting to the second format.
| |||