Anonymous user
Category talk:UNIX Shell: Difference between revisions
<lang bash> or <lang sh>?
(reply: split to another page) |
(<lang bash> or <lang sh>?) |
||
Line 1:
==Implementation==
Additions to the "implementation" section too long? Separate into a separate page somewhere?
Line 11:
:I think this is really meaty information that would be wonderful to have on this site, but I agree that it is too much for this page. I think we strive for just a couple paragraph summary on each language category page, so that you don't have to scroll down to see the tasks solved. How about making a new page and link to it from here? Can't think of a good name for it off the top of my head. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 19:44, 12 October 2007 (MDT)
==<lang bash> versus <lang sh>==
I use <lang bash> for all Bourne-compatible examples, including [[pdksh]] and plain [[Bourne Shell]] code. Some other contributors use <lang sh>. Which is better, <lang bash> or <lang sh>? I prefer <lang bash>, because the page at [[Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Syntax Highlighting]] says to use "bash" for "UNIX Shell". --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 16:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
| |||