Anonymous user
Category talk:Solutions by Programming Language: Difference between revisions
Category talk:Solutions by Programming Language (view source)
Revision as of 00:43, 17 November 2007
, 16 years agomore answers
(more answers) |
|||
Line 2:
I think this collection is getting just a little out of hand - should this be sub-categorized somehow? Do we really need Visual Basic and Visual Basic .Net and VB.net (is that just redundant)? In addition to BASIC and FreeBASIC? Does it make sense to have MySQL and PostgreSQL entries? I would bet that MIRC is the same as MIRC scripting language. This whole listing here just looks kinda helter-skelter. [[User:Sgeier|Sgeier]] 18:44, 1 February 2007 (EST)
:Addendum: I also notice LISP vs
::[[Common Lisp]] and [[Scheme]] are certainly different. Maybe [[LISP]] is for solutions common to either? or for the ancient Lisp dialects? Good question. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 17:43, 16 November 2007 (MST)
==add SDL==
Line 8 ⟶ 9:
Since this language aready has tasks solved it should be added to the Solutions by Programming Language section!
:[[SDL]] isn't a programming language, it's a library which makes tasks like GUI development easier. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 23:28, 9 February 2007 (EST)
== C plus plus ==
There's still two different entries here - One for "C plus plus" and one for "C++". [[User:Sgeier|Sgeier]] 00:48, 20 February 2007 (EST)
:Finally fixed.
== Bash vs. Shell vs. Unix Shell ==
| |||