Category talk:RCBF: Difference between revisions
Why RCBF is a category.
No edit summary |
(Why RCBF is a category.) |
||
Line 2:
:It's a bit more than a task really. [[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] was thinking of it as a big project. Wouldn't it be a little odd to have a language interpreter on the same level as the bubble sort? (PS: you can sign your talk posts with <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> and it will fill in the info for you) --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 14:46, 11 December 2007 (MST)
::Takes about 10-15 mins to code a brainfuck interpreter.. I don't see it as a large project (because brainfuck is one of the most simple programming languages in existence for one) and don't think it's out of place next to bubble sort but it would make sense to have it in a catagory like "Compilers/Interpreters/Evaluators" or something [[User:Epsilon|Epsilon]]
:::RCBF is a category because its implementations use [[Template:Collection]]. I wouldn't call it a "big" project, but it's larger than anything we've considered at the same level as a task. In addition, some implementations, like the C++ one, would take up an undesirable amount of space in a multi-language page. Also, originally, RCBF was just a BF implementation written in C++. Mwn3d here added a Java implementation, so I split them into separate pages and created a category (using Template:Colection) for them. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 20:13, 11 December 2007 (MST)
| |||