Category talk:RCBF: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Why RCBF is a category.) |
(Yeah, it should move.) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Takes about 10-15 mins to code a brainfuck interpreter.. I don't see it as a large project (because brainfuck is one of the most simple programming languages in existence for one) and don't think it's out of place next to bubble sort but it would make sense to have it in a catagory like "Compilers/Interpreters/Evaluators" or something [[User:Epsilon|Epsilon]] |
::Takes about 10-15 mins to code a brainfuck interpreter.. I don't see it as a large project (because brainfuck is one of the most simple programming languages in existence for one) and don't think it's out of place next to bubble sort but it would make sense to have it in a catagory like "Compilers/Interpreters/Evaluators" or something [[User:Epsilon|Epsilon]] |
||
:::RCBF is a category because its implementations use [[Template:Collection]]. I wouldn't call it a "big" project, but it's larger than anything we've considered at the same level as a task. In addition, some implementations, like the C++ one, would take up an undesirable amount of space in a multi-language page. Also, originally, RCBF was just a BF implementation written in C++. Mwn3d here added a Java implementation, so I split them into separate pages and created a category (using Template:Colection) for them. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 20:13, 11 December 2007 (MST) |
:::RCBF is a category because its implementations use [[Template:Collection]]. I wouldn't call it a "big" project, but it's larger than anything we've considered at the same level as a task. In addition, some implementations, like the C++ one, would take up an undesirable amount of space in a multi-language page. Also, originally, RCBF was just a BF implementation written in C++. Mwn3d here added a Java implementation, so I split them into separate pages and created a category (using Template:Colection) for them. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 20:13, 11 December 2007 (MST) |
||
: I'm thinking this, RCSNUSP, RCRPG, etc should all be moved to regular pages like virtually all the other tasks, with links to the relevant implementations. This will solve a problem in ImplSearchBot where they show up as unimplemented in ''all'' languages. Nothing stops this category from continuing to exist; It's definitely nice for [[Template:Collection}}, but it shouldn't be part of [[:Category:Programming Tasks]]. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 08:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||