Category talk:Programming paradigm/Functional: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(I understand the language better, but I think the bigger need is in category structure)
No edit summary
 
Line 3:
:: Better? --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 15:03, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
::: While I can now understand the language better, that's not really where my primary concerns were. I think we should stop including languages directly into the category, though, and instead use subcategories (e.g. [[:Category:Programming paradigm/Functional/First-class Functions/degree and explicitness of enforcement or support]] and [[:Category:Programming paradigm/Functional/Return-encoded state change/degree and explicitness of enforcement or support]]) to associate langauges with the paradigm. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 16:09, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
:::: Those sound like spectrums (where most languages are somewhere within the spectrum) rather than categories (where the appropriateness of the label might be ambiguous for some languages but is probably unambiguous for most languages). --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 19:31, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
6,951

edits