Anonymous user
Category talk:Programming paradigm/Concatenative: Difference between revisions
Category talk:Programming paradigm/Concatenative (view source)
Revision as of 14:49, 7 April 2011
, 13 years agoAn attempt at a response
(Created page with "What belongs in this category? For example: Should Forth be in this category? How about languages which can be used for Concatenative Programming but which allow (or even enco...") |
(An attempt at a response) |
||
Line 1:
What belongs in this category? For example: Should Forth be in this category? How about languages which can be used for Concatenative Programming but which allow (or even encourage) other styles of programming? --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 14:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
:Treat it like the other programming paradigm pages. I guess we could say "if you can use this paradigm in the language and it doesn't go against the idioms of the language, it can be part of this paradigm category"? That probably deserves a vote. I'm no expert on whatever concatenative programming is, but it seems like Forth should be here based on the text on the page. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 14:49, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
| |||