Anonymous user
Category talk:Programming Languages: Difference between revisions
Category talk:Programming Languages (view source)
Revision as of 19:17, 28 April 2009
, 15 years agono edit summary
(sql like pascal...? (haven't I already written it? forgot to do save or server prblm?)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13:
::: As a side-benefit, this allows us to identify language extensions as dialects of a language; Code that uses gcc extensions can be identified as using the GCC dialect of the language, while code that uses MSVC extension can be similarly categorized. the [[Template:works with|works with]] template is a horrible hack that resulted from needing to organize data without being able to properly define that organization. If we can obviate it without necessitating forty different templates per code example, I'd be really, really happy. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 18:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
:::: This would mean also that all ''Pascal'' examples "working with" this or that "implementation" (gpc, FreePascal, TurboPascal...) should become ''dialects of''...? With Pascal, the template '''works with''' sufficed, or at least so it seemed to me. Maybe SQL after all fell in the same trap? --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 18:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::I think BASIC has the same kind of thing going on. We need to work to distinguish dialects from implementations (if we want a distinction) if we want this to work. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 19:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
| |||