Category talk:Plain English: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (it is real) |
(Response about clutter.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Clutter?== |
==<strike>Clutter?</strike>== |
||
I am concerned that this "language" clutters up the place (RC). It seems to me that each entry is merely a bare-bones re-telling of the ''Task Description''. On the plus side, this language does supply some stress relief and some levity. I'm not encouraging anyone to remove it, but if it was decided to omit it, I could understand why. |
I am concerned that this "language" clutters up the place (RC). It seems to me that each entry is merely a bare-bones re-telling of the ''Task Description''. On the plus side, this language does supply some stress relief and some levity. I'm not encouraging anyone to remove it, but if it was decided to omit it, I could understand why. |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Added a discussion link to the main page. While this is not really my cup of tea, it is quite wrong to suggest or imply this is not a "real" programming language. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 15:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC) |
:Added a discussion link to the main page. While this is not really my cup of tea, it is quite wrong to suggest or imply this is not a "real" programming language. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 15:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Ah, the clue train shows signs of slowing down to a stop for me. It seems that I had only come across the PE examples at RC where the task description did not require output. I eventually spotted one with output, and noted that the PE source was indeed substantial enough to accomplish the task. I apologize for the disparaging remarks I made about PE. I stand corrected, not clutter. --[[User:Enter your username|Enter your username]] ([[User talk:Enter your username|talk]]) 17:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||