Category talk:OoRexx: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


Remember that by contributing programs to Rosetta Code you are "promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource" [sic.]
Remember that by contributing programs to Rosetta Code you are "promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource" [sic.]

== Coloring / Highlighting Rexx code ==

I asked for adding GeShi highlighting for Rexx (and ooRexx) code.
This is now in place.
Please state whether you like it, hate it, want it removed, want it changed.
Always trying and sometimes achieving something
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]]

Revision as of 08:28, 9 June 2012

Plagiarism

In that the code presented herein is covered by the GNU Free Documentation Licence 1.2, I'm not convinced that anything developed or reimplemented from an example in another language can be or should be identified as "plagiarized", particularly if the appropriate acknowledgements are in place. (Rosetta Code even provides the means witihin the editor to indicate that a program is a direct translation of some other work via the {{trans|XXXX}} template. [see Template:Trans]) Plagiarism can be a very emotive word and a serious charge to level at someone, particularly when related to software development; we should avoid describing work presented here as such.

Remember that by contributing programs to Rosetta Code you are "promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource" [sic.]

Coloring / Highlighting Rexx code

I asked for adding GeShi highlighting for Rexx (and ooRexx) code. This is now in place. Please state whether you like it, hate it, want it removed, want it changed. Always trying and sometimes achieving something --Walterpachl