Anonymous user
Category talk:OoRexx: Difference between revisions
m
→Coloring / Highlighting Rexx code: chicken lips term. -- ~~~~
(→Coloring / Highlighting Rexx code: clarified usage. -- ~~~~) |
m (→Coloring / Highlighting Rexx code: chicken lips term. -- ~~~~) |
||
Line 249:
:: (small fix in the code above--shouldn't have caused malfunction, though) I don't know much about IE, and frankly I don't want to care. As to "installing in all your preferences", putting it in the shared custom javascript alone should be enough--or so I thought, I'm no MediaWiki expert. And, "chickenlips"? That's a midwestern euphemism for somthing? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 03:00, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
::: Oh, I'm sorry, I thought everybody knew what that is. Chickenlips are the (curly) braces: ''' { } ''' --- a somewhat perjorative and amusing term, I believe.
----
I also vote YES for syntax coloring. As I'm new to Rexx it's fairly difficult for me to read the code without syntax highlights. On the other side I guess everybody agrees that Rexx is not the most widespread and most popular language around, so there are potentially more developers out there who are actually very interested in Rexx and who would need the highlighting as much as I do. --[[User:RolandR|RolandR]] 08:10, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
| |||