Anonymous user
Category talk:Non-Programming Languages: Difference between revisions
Category talk:Non-Programming Languages (view source)
Revision as of 09:33, 6 July 2009
, 14 years agono edit summary
(Its' what they say its primary function is?) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3:
The primary focus of the developers isn't to produce a programming language. So sed is an editor as are vim and emacs,bc is a calculator, and m4 a macro processor. The fact that they might accomplish RC tasks doesn't mean that they should be considered as programming languages. Shades of grey. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 09:17, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
: But the examples of this category are HTML, [[JSON]], SGML, [[SVG]] and XML. Their distinguishing feature is that they are not programming languages ''at all''; it happens that they're all data description languages (and yes, can describe or embed programs). —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
| |||