Category talk:NetRexx: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(NetRexx can be interpreted or compiled)
 
(Done)
 
Line 3: Line 3:


Should one mention that it can also be used as Interpreter? --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 09:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Should one mention that it can also be used as Interpreter? --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 09:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
:Done. Luckily there was already an option in the language template for a language that can be both compiled and interpreted. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 13:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:36, 13 August 2012

Language tags say: Execution method: Compiled (bytecode)

Should one mention that it can also be used as Interpreter? --Walterpachl 09:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Luckily there was already an option in the language template for a language that can be both compiled and interpreted. --Mwn3d 13:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)