Category talk:JavaScript: Difference between revisions
Ok, paradigm templates are the wrong approach.
m (move discussion to fp talk unless there is something specific to JS) |
(Ok, paradigm templates are the wrong approach.) |
||
Line 45:
:::: It just so happens that declarative programming is probably the most important part of ''effective'' FP. By telling the computer what to do rather then how to do it, you free up the compiler to optimize and parallelize at will. –[[User:Jhuni|Jhuni]] 01:42, 2 Janurary 2010 (UTC)
:::: Since we aren't really talking about JavaScript anymore, and I have made basically all my points about the language itself, we may as well move this to [http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category_talk:Programming_paradigm/Functional Talk:FP]. –[[User:Jhuni|Jhuni]] 01:49, 2 Janurary 2010 (UTC)
::::: Unless a paradigm is fundamentally impossible in a programming language (perhaps it's made so by some feature of the VM), a programmer can employ that paradigm, regardless of how convoluted or tricky it might be. What all this tells me is that templates and language-page modifications are the ''wrong'' way on Rosetta Code to associate langauges with paradigms, and that a "show me the code" approach is really what's necessary. To that end, tasks would be needed in order to provoke demonstrations of aspects of a given paradigm. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 02:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
| |||