Category talk:JavaScript: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Category talk:JavaScript (view source)

Revision as of 12:32, 2 January 2011

89 bytes added , 13 years ago

→‎Is JavaScript functional?: Isn't it nice when things lead to new tasks? :-)

Anonymous user

rosettacode>Dkf

Revision as of 03:13, 2 January 2011 (view source) rosettacode>Jhuni m (Enforce Immutability) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 12:32, 2 January 2011 (view source) rosettacode>Dkf (→‎Is JavaScript functional?: Isn't it nice when things lead to new tasks? :-))
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 46: :::: Since we aren't really talking about JavaScript anymore, and I have made basically all my points about the language itself, we may as well move this to [http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category_talk:Programming_paradigm/Functional Talk:FP]. –[[User:Jhuni\|Jhuni]] 01:49, 2 Janurary 2010 (UTC) ::::: Unless a paradigm is fundamentally impossible in a programming language (perhaps it's made so by some feature of the VM), a programmer can employ that paradigm, regardless of how convoluted or tricky it might be. What all this tells me is that templates and language-page modifications are the ''wrong'' way on Rosetta Code to associate langauges with paradigms, and that a "show me the code" approach is really what's necessary. To that end, tasks would be needed in order to provoke demonstrations of aspects of a given paradigm. --[[User:Short Circuit\|Michael Mol]] 02:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC) :::::: I would like to see a "enforce immutability" task that shows what means languages have to enforce immutability~~, or~~ toon ~~prevent modification of variables~~values, parameters, methods, and other things. --–[[User:Jhuni\|Jhuni]] 03:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC) 03::::::: I see that you've been working on such a task. Cool! –[[User:Dkf\|Donal Fellows]] 12:32, 2 January 2011 (UTC)