Category talk:J: Difference between revisions
→GeSHi Highlighter for J: Added User: namespace label to the reference to Michael Moi's username.
(→Jers) |
(→GeSHi Highlighter for J: Added User: namespace label to the reference to Michael Moi's username.) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 13:
:: Yeah, you're right. I guess I didn't look at enough examples. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 08:53, 10 December 2007 (MST)
:Definitely not esoteric, though very hard to read unless you have learned the vocabulary and tacit programming idioms. I would encourage folks to annotate the examples here and also contribute well annotated examples to the Literate Programs wiki (see [[Help:Similar Sites]]). --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 13:11, 10 December 2007 (MST)
::: I was curious about that quoted line and so I went and looked it up -- it actually would not work in current versions of J (because <code>x.</code> was replaced with <code>x</code> in 1996 when
== Jedi (was Jers) ==
The "Jers" section could be maintained by the site if all the users would sign up and put a <nowiki>{{mylang|J|proficiency}} row in a {{mylangbegin}}...{{mylangend}}</nowiki> table. The users would show up in [[:Category:J User]] which is already on the language page. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 13:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
:: Yes, but I'm not sure some of the Jers perceive themselves to be involved enough in RC to sign up. Also, having the special section allows me to add value to the Jers list (like links to the J wiki).
I changed the designation of people-who-use-J to "Jedi" because it's more fun but I didn't change the
==Tasks==
Line 47:
--[[User:Tikkanz|Tikkanz]] 00:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
The template has now been tested and emailed to [[
<tt><nowiki><lang j></nowiki> one or more lines of code here <nowiki></lang></nowiki></tt>
Line 56:
You may want to reconsider doing this, since at the moment I'm working on a bot to correct lang tags for nearly every task and nearly every language (including J) on Rosetta Code. It won't be perfect, but it should get the majority of cases right. —[[User:Underscore|Underscore]] ([[User talk:Underscore|Talk]]) 11:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
:Will it add tags where they don't
::The former. It's gotten rather smart. More details to follow soonish (probably before Monday, if not today). —[[User:Underscore|Underscore]] ([[User talk:Underscore|Talk]]) 19:16, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
|