Category talk:Excel: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 06:04, 12 July 2015

Personally, I think Excel is a bona fide programming language. When I worked for Microsoft Research a claim was made in a lab seminar, by a language theory researcher who shall remain nameless at present but is a leading in the Haskell community, that Excel was by far the most widely used purely functional programming language.

--Brnikat (talk) 20:02, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Good day!

Hmm... Excluding VBA from the topic, Excel's built-in functions/formulas can be considered a programming language. However, I think (just my opinion) Microsoft did not build/made Excel as a programming language/IDE (since it is a spreadsheet program).

If it is necessary, feel free to edit the category. Thanks! --Simple9371 (talk) 03:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 --[[User:Brnikat|Brnikat]] ([[User talk:Brnikat|talk]]) 20:02, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
-Good day!
+:Good day!
-Hmm... Excluding [[VBA]] from the topic, Excel's built-in functions/formulas can be considered a programming language. However, I think (just my opinion) Microsoft did not build/''made'' Excel as a programming language/IDE (since it is a spreadsheet program).
+:Hmm... Excluding [[VBA]] from the topic, Excel's built-in functions/formulas can be considered a programming language. However, I think (just my opinion) Microsoft did not build/''made'' Excel as a programming language/IDE (since it is a spreadsheet program).
-If it is necessary, feel free to edit the category. Thanks! --[[User:Simple9371|Simple9371]] ([[User talk:Simple9371|talk]]) 03:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
+:If it is necessary, feel free to edit the category. Thanks! --[[User:Simple9371|Simple9371]] ([[User talk:Simple9371|talk]]) 03:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)