Category talk:Common Lisp: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:
==ECL==
==ECL==
[[ECL]] links to a different language, so I used a red link [[ECL (Lisp)]] at [[Read a file character by character/UTF8#Common Lisp]] to say that it works with ECL. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] ([[User talk:Kernigh|talk]]) 01:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
[[ECL]] links to a different language, so I used a red link [[ECL (Lisp)]] at [[Read a file character by character/UTF8#Common Lisp]] to say that it works with ECL. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] ([[User talk:Kernigh|talk]]) 01:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

== How can I run a LISP program? ==

How can I run a LISP program that refers to a function definition, i.e., where should I store this definition so that (fun 1 2 3) finds it? --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 08:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:02, 25 May 2016

Categorization in Language Template is Inaccurate

I've marked CL as going to machine code normally (after all, that's what the Wikipedia article claims once you sort through the confusion) though I accept that this is inaccurate for a language of CL's subtlety in this area. —Donal Fellows 08:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

ECL

ECL links to a different language, so I used a red link ECL (Lisp) at Read a file character by character/UTF8#Common Lisp to say that it works with ECL. --Kernigh (talk) 01:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

How can I run a LISP program?

How can I run a LISP program that refers to a function definition, i.e., where should I store this definition so that (fun 1 2 3) finds it? --Walterpachl (talk) 08:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)