Category talk:C1R: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "== Stupid === This means that nearly every C1R "solution" in Rosetta is simply a heading, followed by string which gives the path name to the C solution. This is a form of redu...") |
(Should Rosetta Code delete every C1R solution?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Stupid |
== Stupid == |
||
This means that nearly every C1R "solution" in Rosetta is simply a heading, followed by string which gives the path name to the C solution. |
This means that nearly every C1R "solution" in Rosetta is simply a heading, followed by string which gives the path name to the C solution. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/192.139.122.42|192.139.122.42]] 22:40, 21 November 2011 (UTC) |
[[Special:Contributions/192.139.122.42|192.139.122.42]] 22:40, 21 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
: Should Rosetta Code delete every C1R solution? --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 00:38, 22 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:38, 22 November 2011
Stupid
This means that nearly every C1R "solution" in Rosetta is simply a heading, followed by string which gives the path name to the C solution.
This is a form of redudnancy that is effectively spam.
- David St. Hubbins: It's such a fine line between stupid, and uh...
- Nigel Tufnel: Clever.
- David St. Hubbins: Yeah, and clever.
192.139.122.42 22:40, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Should Rosetta Code delete every C1R solution? --Kernigh 00:38, 22 November 2011 (UTC)