Anonymous user
Category talk:AutoHotkey Originated: Difference between revisions
→Is This A Good Thing?: whatever...
m (→Is This A Good Thing?: use right math symbol) |
(→Is This A Good Thing?: whatever...) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 16:
: I think there's no need for such a thing too. If a task has no pseudocode and task's author (or others) wants to point a language as a "good example" of how the task can be done, then it's enough to write it in the task someway. --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 21:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
:: I also don't think we need to do this as a site-wide initiative, and I'd even be tempted to urge people to put this sort of information only on <code>talk:</code> pages. If the task is worthy of being here, it's possible to do it in many languages/libraries and so it shouldn't matter what it was written for first. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 08:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
::: UPDATE: I've moved the categorizations. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 08:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
::::That didn't change much. I don't think it addressed the original concern which is that this is probably not the right place for discussion about these tasks. This list could be manually kept (since the first language to implement a task won't change) as a subpage of the AutoHotkey language page with no markings at all on task pages or their related pages (that is, if it should be kept at all). --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 17:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
:::::I'm singularly unbothered about the whole thing now it's off the beaten track of main pages. (I track the pages I create — that I care about — in my watchlist, which seems a better spot to me, but that's a separate matter.) —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 20:45, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
| |||