Anonymous user
Category talk:AWK: Difference between revisions
→It's a programming language
(weak attempt at enueration types for AWK) |
|||
Line 1:
There is a problem with the enumeration entry for AWK, as there is with several other languages, in that it does not show examples of the USE of the enumeration type, only its definition. By giving an example of the use of the scheme suggested for AWK, it will be apparent that it is quite weak.
==It's a programming language==
Can't we state up front that AWK is a programming language? It's a very good scripting language, but the current definition seems to skip around the obvious. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 21:29, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
| |||