Category:J: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Rdm (talk | contribs)
Rdm (talk | contribs)
Line 66: Line 66:
Another pervasive feature of the language is [[wp:Rank_(J_programming_language)|rank]].
Another pervasive feature of the language is [[wp:Rank_(J_programming_language)|rank]].


Perhaps also worth noting is that the underlying language concepts are meant to represent the capabilities of hardware. For example, in principle, you could implement and use the language without a stack - this would mean that a word's definition could not be used during the execution of that word. All current J implementations support recursion, but in some sense this is a convenience, and it's reasonable to imagine J implementations which do not (perhaps in a "compile to silicon" implementation).
The language represents capabilities of hardware. For example, if language did not have an internal stack, a word's definition could not be used during the execution of that word. All current J implementations support recursion, but in some sense this is a convenience, and it's reasonable to imagine J implementations which do not (perhaps in a "compile to silicon" implementation).


== J on RosettaCode ==
== J on RosettaCode ==