Call a function: Difference between revisions

m
syntax highlighting fixup automation
m (syntax highlighting fixup automation)
Line 27:
{{trans|Python}}
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=11l>F no_args() {}
// call
no_args()
Line 43:
// calls
opt_args() // 1
opt_args(3.141) // 3.141</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|360 Assembly}}==
Due to assembler, argument are passed by reference.<br>
With:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=360asm>X DS F
Y DS F
Z DS F</langsyntaxhighlight>
If you do not want to use the CALL macro instruction and for a link-edited object-module:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=360asm> L R15,=V(MULTPLIC)
LA R1,PARMLIST address of the paramter list
BALR R14,R15 branch and link
Line 58:
* ...
PARMLIST DC A(X)
DC A(Y)</langsyntaxhighlight>
If you call a link-edited object-module:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=360asm> CALL MULTPLIC,(X,Y) call MULTPLIC(X,Y)
ST R0,Z Z=MULTPLIC(X,Y)</langsyntaxhighlight>
If you call an load-module at execution time:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=360asm> LOAD EP=MULTPLIC load load-module
LR R15,R0 retrieve entry address
CALL (R15),(X,Y) call MULTPLIC(X,Y)
ST R0,Z Z=MULTPLIC(X,Y)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|6502 Assembly}}==
Line 72:
To call a function, you use <code>JSR</code> followed by the pointer to its beginning. Most of the time this will be a labeled line of code that your assembler will convert to an actual memory address for you during the assembly process.
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =6502asm>JSR myFunction</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Function arguments are often passed in through registers, the zero page, or the stack. Given how awkward it is to work with the stack on the 6502, it's best not to use the hardware stack as a means of parameter passing. CC65 uses a software stack in the upper half of zero page, which is indexed using the X register.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=6502asm>sum:
;adds the values in zero page address $00 and $01, outputs to accumulator.
LDA $00 ;load the byte stored at memory address $0000
CLC
ADC $01 ;add the byte at memory address $0001
RTS ;return</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
The return value is usually stored in the accumulator if it will fit in 8 bits. If not, it's often stored in a dedicated section of the zero page. Since the 6502 has very few registers and all are 8-bit, it's common to set aside a few zero page memory addresses for holding 16-bit return values.
Line 91:
To call a function, you use <code>JSR</code> followed by the pointer to its beginning. Most of the time this will be a labeled line of code that your assembler will convert to an actual memory address for you during the assembly process.
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =68000devpac>JSR myFunction</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Function arguments are often passed in through the stack. When looking at the function in C or a similar language that compiles to 68000 Assembly, the arguments are pushed in the reverse order they are listed. Return values typically go into the D0 register if they're 32-bit or smaller. The CPU does not enforce this, so it's up to the programmer or compiler to use calling conventions to ensure compatibility between software.
Line 100:
 
A function that requires no arguments is simply <code>CALL</code>ed:
<syntaxhighlight lang =asm>call foo</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Functions with a fixed number of arguments have their arguments pushed onto the stack prior to the call. This is how C compilers generate 8086 assembly code. Assembly written by a person can use the stack or registers to pass arguments. Passing via registers is faster but more prone to errors and clobbering, which can cause other functions to not operate correctly.
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=asm>push ax ;second argument
push bx ;first argument - typically arguments are pushed in the reverse order they are listed.
call foo
Line 113:
push bp
mov bp,sp
;now bp+4 = the value pushed from BX, and bp+6 = the value pushed from AX</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
The 8086 cannot support named arguments directly. However it is possible to label a section of RAM, and use that as the argument for a function.
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=asm>foo:
ld ax,word ptr[ds:bar] ;load from bar, which is a 16 bit storage location in the data segment (DS), into AX</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Built-in functions are typically called using the <code>INT</code> instruction. This instruction takes a numeric constant as its primary argument, and the value in <code>AH</code> as a selector of sorts. This command is used to exit a program and return to MS-DOS:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=asm>mov AH,4Ch
mov AL,00h
int 21h</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|AArch64 Assembly}}==
{{works with|as|Raspberry Pi 3B version Buster 64 bits}}
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=AArch64 Assembly>
/* ARM assembly AARCH64 Raspberry PI 3B */
/* program callfonct.s */
Line 228:
.include "../includeARM64.inc"
 
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
{{output}}
<pre>
Line 238:
=={{header|ActionScript}}==
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=actionscript> myfunction(); /* function with no arguments in statement context */
myfunction(6,b); // function with two arguments in statement context
stringit("apples"); //function with a string argument</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Ada}}==
Line 250:
* There are no differences between calling built-in vs. user defined functions.
 
* Functions without parameters can be called by omitting the parameter list (no empty brackets!):<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Ada>S: String := Ada.Text_IO.Get_Line;</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Ada supports functions with optional parameters:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Ada>function F(X: Integer; Y: Integer := 0) return Integer; -- Y is optional
...
A : Integer := F(12);
B : Integer := F(12, 0); -- the same as A
C : Integer := F(12, 1); -- something different</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* If the number of parameters of F were fixed to two (by omitting the ":= 0" in the specification), then B and C would be OK, but A wouldn't.
 
* Ada does not support functions with a variable number of arguments. But a function argument can be an unconstrained array with as many values as you want:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Ada>type Integer_Array is array (Positive range <>) of Integer;
function Sum(A: Integer_Array) return Integer is
S: Integer := 0;
Line 271:
...
A := Sum((1,2,3)); -- A = 6
B := Sum((1,2,3,4)); -- B = 10</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* One can realize first-class functions by defining an access to a function as a parameter:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Ada>function H (Int: Integer;
Fun: not null access function (X: Integer; Y: Integer)
return Integer);
Line 281:
 
X := H(A, F'Access) -- assuming X and A are Integers, and F is a function
-- taking two Integers and returning an Integer.</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* The caller is free to use either positional parameters or named parameters, or a mixture of both (with positional parameters first) <langsyntaxhighlight lang=Ada>Positional := H(A, F'Access);
Named := H(Int => A, Fun => F'Access);
Mixed := H(A, Fun=>F'Access); </langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|ALGOL 68}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=algol68># Note functions and subroutines are called procedures (or PROCs) in Algol 68 #
# A function called without arguments: #
f;
Line 326:
# If the function is declared with argument(s) of mode REF MODE,
then those arguments are being passed by reference. #
# Technically, all parameters are passed by value, however the value of a REF MODE is a reference... #</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
See [http://rosettacode.org/wiki/First-class_functions#ALGOL_68 First-Class Functions] for an example of first-class functions in ALGOL 68.<br>
Line 334:
 
=={{header|ALGOL W}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=algolw>% Note, in Algol W, functions are called procedures %
% calling a function with no parameters: %
f;
Line 371:
% parameters are somewhat like macros %
 
% Partial application is not possible in Algol W %</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|AntLang}}==
AntLang provides two ways to apply a function.
One way is infix application.
<syntaxhighlight lang =AntLang>2*2+9</langsyntaxhighlight>
Infix application is right associative, so x f y g z means x f (y g z) and not (x f y) g z.
You can break this rule using parenthesis.
The other way is prefix application.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=AntLang>*[2;+[2;9]]
echo["Hello!"]
time[]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|ARM Assembly}}==
{{works with|as|Raspberry Pi}}
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ARM Assembly>
 
/* ARM assembly Raspberry PI */
Line 560:
.Ls_magic_number_10: .word 0x66666667
 
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Arturo}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=rebol>printHello: $[][
print "Hello World!"
]
Line 599:
 
print num
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
{{out}}
Line 614:
 
=={{header|AutoHotkey}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=AHK>; Call a function without arguments:
f()
 
Line 653:
 
; Partial application is impossible.
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|AWK}}==
Line 659:
The awk interpreter reads the entire script prior to processing, so functions can be called from sections of code appearing before the definition.
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=awk>BEGIN {
sayhello() # Call a function with no parameters in statement context
b=squareit(3) # Obtain the return value from a function with a single parameter in first class context
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
In awk, scalar values are passed by value, but arrays are passed by reference. Note that if a function has no arguments, then empty parentheses are required.
Line 670:
=={{header|Axe}}==
In Axe, up to six arguments are passed as the variables r₁ through r₆. As with all variables in Axe, these exist in the global scope, which makes nested function calls and recursion quite difficult.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=axe>NOARG()
ARGS(1,5,42)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Since arguments are simply global variables, they are always optional and can be omitted from right to left.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=axe>OPARG(1,2,3,4,5,6)
OPARG(1,2,3)
OPARG()</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Somewhat similar to [[TI-83 BASIC]], the last evaluated expression becomes the return value of the function. However, this is distinct from the Ans variable. Return values can be captured just like any other expression.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=axe>MATHS(2,4)→A
Disp GETSTR()</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
User-defined functions can be distinguished from language-defined functions by the fact that language-defined function names are composed of atomic tokens (usually with built-in parentheses) whereas user-defined function names are composed of individual characters. Also, because only uppercase letters are available by default in the OS, most user-defined names are all uppercase while language-defined names are mixed case.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=axe>USER()
axeFunc()</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
 
=={{header|BASIC256}}==
{{trans|FreeBASIC}}
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=basic256>function Copialo$ (txt$, siNo, final$)
nuevaCadena$ = ""
 
Line 721:
print
call testCadenas("1, 2, 3, 4, cadena, 6, 7, 8, \#incluye texto\#")
end</langsyntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
<pre>
Line 732:
Batch files do not have a traditional "function" system like OOP languages, however this is the closest thing to it. The only difference between a block of code and a function is the way method you choose to invoke it. It's also worth noting that all batch files can be called from any other batch file, performing a function. A function should be put somewhere in the code where it will not be parsed unless the script is redirected there.
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=dos>
:: http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Call_a_function
:: Demonstrate the different syntax and semantics provided for calling a function.
Line 819:
endlocal & echo.%filepath%%filename%
goto:eof
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
Output:
<pre>
Line 844:
BBC BASIC distinguishes between functions (which return one value), procedures (which may return an arbitrary number of values including zero), and subroutines. Functions can be built-in or user-defined.
A call to a <b>built-in function</b> (for example, the square root function) is an expression:
<syntaxhighlight lang =bbcbasic>PRINT SQR(2)</langsyntaxhighlight>
The parentheses can often be omitted:
<syntaxhighlight lang =bbcbasic>PRINT SQR 2</langsyntaxhighlight>
The name of a <b>user-defined function</b> must begin with <tt>FN</tt>. A call to it is also an expression:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=bbcbasic>PRINT FN_foo(bar$, baz%)</langsyntaxhighlight>
(The sigils <tt>$</tt> and <tt>%</tt> identify the variables' types.)
A function that takes no arguments can be called omitting the parentheses:
<syntaxhighlight lang =bbcbasic>PRINT FN_foo</langsyntaxhighlight>
The name of a <b>procedure</b> must begin with <tt>PROC</tt>. A call to it is a statement, not an expression:
<syntaxhighlight lang =bbcbasic>PROC_foo</langsyntaxhighlight>
If it has arguments, they come in parentheses just as with a function:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=bbcbasic>PROC_foo(bar$, baz%, quux)</langsyntaxhighlight>
Note that you <i>cannot tell from this syntax</i> which of the variables <tt>bar$</tt>, <tt>baz%</tt>, and <tt>quux</tt> are arguments provided to the procedure and which of them are return values from it. You have to look at where it is defined:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=bbcbasic>DEF PROC_foo(a$, RETURN b%, RETURN c)</langsyntaxhighlight>
<b>Subroutines</b> are provided for compatibility with older, unstructured dialects of BASIC; otherwise they are never really used. They require statements to be numbered, and they can neither receive arguments nor return values: they can only manipulate global variables. The <tt>GOSUB</tt> and <tt>RETURN</tt> statements in fact mirror assembly language 'jump to subroutine' and 'return from subroutine' instructions quite closely.
<syntaxhighlight lang =bbcbasic>200 GOSUB 30050</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
 
Line 869:
'''Calling a function that requires no arguments:''' BQN does not have zero argument functions. Having a function that does so is done with the help of a dummy argument, like so:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=BQN>{𝕊 ·: 1 + 1}0</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
The dot symbol <code>·</code> indicates that the argument is nothing, and hence is discarded. Hence, the zero provided to it is discarded, and 1 + 1 = 2 is returned.
Line 875:
'''Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments:''' BQN functions always take 1 or two arguments, and their names must always start with a capital letter. A function is called like a primitive function, by writing its name or the function itself between the arguments. For example, given a function named <code>F</code>:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =bqn>F 1</langsyntaxhighlight> is an example of a single argument call.
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =bqn>2 F 1</langsyntaxhighlight> is an example of a two argument call.
 
'''Calling a function with optional arguments:''' optional arguments are not supported by BQN.
Line 885:
'''Calling a function with named arguments:''' BQN has block headers, which destructure an input array into given variables using pattern matching. These can then be referenced later by the names given.
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=bqn>{
𝕊 one‿two‿three:
one∾two∾three
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Given a three element array, the above example will concatenate them all together.
Line 894:
'''Using a function in statement context:''' BQN user defined functions have the same syntactic roles as primitive functions in an expression, so they can be used like any primitive.
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =bqn>1 {𝕨+𝕩} 2</langsyntaxhighlight>
is the same as
<syntaxhighlight lang =bqn>1 + 2</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
'''Using a function in first-class context within an expression:''' BQN supports lisp-style functional programming, and hence supports first class usage of functions.
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =bqn>⟨+, -, ∾⟩</langsyntaxhighlight>
is an example of a list of functions, which can later be called with the help of a higher order function.
 
'''Obtaining the return value of a function:''' A block function will always return the value of the last statement within it. To obtain the return value of a function, you can assign it to a variable, or modify an existing variable with the return value.
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=bqn>var ← Func # insert arg here</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Arguments are passed to BQN functions by value only.
Line 911:
'''Partial Application:''' BQN has two combinators for this purpose. Before (<code>⊸</code>) returns a function with a constant left argument, and After (<code>⟜</code>) returns a function with a constant right argument.
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =bqn>+⟜2</langsyntaxhighlight> will add two to the number given to it.
<syntaxhighlight lang =bqn>2⊸-</langsyntaxhighlight> will subtract its input from two.
 
=={{header|Bracmat}}==
Line 920:
Strictly speaking, all Bracmat functions receive at least one argument. But empty strings are valid expressions, so you can do
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =bracmat>aFunctionWithoutArguments$</langsyntaxhighlight>
or
<syntaxhighlight lang =bracmat>aFunctionWithoutArguments'</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Both function calls pass the right and side of the <code>$</code> or <code>'</code> operator. This is in fact still something: an empty string.
Line 949:
 
You can do
<syntaxhighlight lang =bracmat>func$!myargument;</langsyntaxhighlight>
The <code>;</code> marks the end of a Bracmat statement.
 
Line 956:
(Copied from JavaScript:) Bracmat functions are first-class citizens; they can be stored in variables and passed as arguments. Assigning to a variable <code>yourfunc</code> can be done in a few ways. The most common one is
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=bracmat>(yourfunc=local vars.function body)</langsyntaxhighlight>
If there is already a function <code>myfunc</code> that you want to assign to <code>yourfunc</code> as well, do
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=bracmat>('$myfunc:(=?yourfunc))</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Obtaining the return value of a function
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =bracmat>myfunc$!myarg:?myresult</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Notice that the returned value can be any evaluated expression.
Line 974:
You can ignore the return value of a function <code>myfunc</code> as follows:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =bracmat>myfunc$!myarg&yourfunc$!yourarg</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
But notice that if <code>myfunc</code> fails, the above expression returns the value produced by <code>myfunc</code>! To also ignore the success/failure of a function, do
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=bracmat>`(myfunc$!myarg)&yourfunc$!yourarg</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Stating whether arguments are passed by value or by reference
Line 988:
There is no special syntax for that, but you can write a function that e.g., can take a list with one or with two elements and that returns a function in the first case.
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=bracmat>( ( plus
= a b
. !arg:%?a ?b
Line 997:
& out$("1+2, not partial:" plus$(1 2))
& out$("1+2, partial:" (plus$1)$2)
);</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Output:
Line 1,005:
 
=={{header|C}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=c>/* function with no argument */
f();
 
Line 1,069:
 
/* Scalar values are passed by value by default. However, arrays are passed by reference. */
/* Pointers *sort of* work like references, though. */</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|C sharp|C#}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=c sharp>
/* a function that has no argument */
public int MyFunction();
Line 1,103:
public internal MyFunction();
int returnValue = MyFunction();
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|C++}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=C++>
 
/* function with no arguments */
foo();
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=C++>
/* passing arguments by value*/
/* function with one argument */
Line 1,118:
/* function with multiple arguments */
baz(arg1, arg2);
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=C++>
/* get return value of a function */
variable = function(args);
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=C++>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
Line 1,140:
cout<<"x = "<<x<<endl; /* should produce result "x = 1" */
}
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|COBOL}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=cobol>CALL "No-Arguments"
 
*> Fixed number of arguments.
Line 1,207:
ACCEPT Foo *> Get a PROGRAM-ID from the user.
CALL "Use-Func" USING Foo
CALL Foo USING Bar</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Clojure}}==
Line 1,213:
 
'''Calling a function that requires no arguments'''
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>
(defn one []
"Function that takes no arguments and returns 1"
Line 1,219:
 
(one); => 1
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
'''Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments'''
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>
(defn total-cost [item-price num-items]
"Returns the total price to buy the given number of items"
Line 1,227:
 
(total-cost 1 5); => 5
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
'''Calling a function with optional arguments'''
The syntax is exactly the same for the calling code; here's an example of the exact same function as above, except now it takes an optional third argument (discount-percentage)
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>
(defn total-cost-with-discount [item-price num-items & [discount-percentage]]
"Returns total price to buy the items after discount is applied (if given)"
Line 1,244:
;; Or we can add the third parameter to calculate the cost with 20% discount
(total-cost-with-discount 1 5 20); => 4
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
'''Calling a function with a variable number of arguments'''
You can use the optional argument syntax seen above to implement variable numbers, but here's another way to do it by writing multiple functions with different arguments all in one.
 
Once again, calling the function is the same, but you need to know what types of arguments are expected for each arity.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>
(defn make-address
([city place-name] (str place-name ", " city))
Line 1,265:
;; Third case
(make-address "London" "Baker Street" 221 "B"); => "221 Baker Street, Apt. B, London"
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
'''Calling a function with named arguments'''
The way to do this in clojure is to pass the arguments as a map and destructure them by name in the function definition. The syntax is the same, but it requires you to pass a single map argument containing all of your arguments and their names.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>
(defn make-mailing-label [{:keys [name address country]}]
"Returns the correct text to mail a letter to the addressee"
Line 1,281:
(make-mailing-label {:name "Her Majesty"
:address "Buckingham Palace, London"}); => "Her Majesty\nBuckingham Palace, London\nUK"
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
'''Using a function in statement context'''
I'm not really sure what this means - you can use a function to assign a variable, but there aren't really statements
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>
(defn multiply-by-10 [number]
(* 10 number))
Line 1,291:
 
fifty; => 50
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
'''Using a function in first-class context within an expression'''
Line 1,298:
 
You can use one function to create another
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>
(defn make-discount-function [discount-percent]
"Returns a function that takes a price and applies the given discount"
Line 1,316:
(discount-50pc 100); => 50
(discount-50pc 5); => 2.5
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
You can store functions in collections as if they were variables
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>
;; Continuing on the same example, let's imagine Anna has a 20% discount card and Bill has 50%. Charlie pays full price
;; We can store their discount functions in a map
Line 1,336:
(calculate-discounted-price 100 "Bill"); => 50
(calculate-discounted-price 100 "Charlie"); => 100
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
You can pass functions as arguments to other functions
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>;; Here we have two functions to format a price depending on the country
 
(defn format-price-uk [price]
Line 1,357:
 
(format-receipt "Toilet Paper" 5 format-price-us); => "Toilet Paper $5"
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
'''Obtaining the return value of a function'''
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>;;You can assign it to a variable:
 
(def receipt-us (format-receipt "Toilet Paper" 5 format-price-us))
Line 1,374:
;; Calls add-store-name with the result of the format function
(add-store-name (format-receipt "Toilet Paper" 5 format-price-us)); => "Toilet Paper $5\n Thanks for shopping at Safeway"
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
'''Distinguishing built-in functions and user-defined functions'''
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>;; They are indistinguishable in Clojure, and you can even override a built in one
 
;; Using built-in addition
Line 1,397:
 
(* 5 5); => 10
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
'''Distinguishing subroutines and functions'''
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>;; They are the same thing - indeed, everything in clojure is a function
;; Functions without return values simply return nil
 
Line 1,406:
 
(no-return-value "hi"); => nil
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
'''Stating whether arguments are passed by value or by reference'''
All data structures are immutable, so they are passed by value only.
The value returned from the function does not change the original input
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>;; Set up a variable that we will pass to a function
(def the-queen {:name "Elizabeth"
:title "Your Majesty"
Line 1,427:
 
;; The original data structure is not changed
the-queen; => {:name "Elizabeth" :title "Your Majesty" :address "Buckingham Palace" :pets ["Corgi" "Horse"]}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
'''Is partial application possible and how'''
Line 1,433:
Yes, it is similar to the discount card case we saw earlier. Instead of having a function return another function, we can use partial:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=clojure>(defn apply-discount [discount-percentage price]
"Function to apply a discount to a price"
(-> price
Line 1,450:
 
(discount-10pc-option-2 100); => 90
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
=={{header|CoffeeScript}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=coffeescript>
# Calling a function that requires no arguments
foo()
Line 1,505:
 
add2 1 #=> 3
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Common Lisp}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lisp>
;Calling a function that requires no arguments
(defun a () "This is the 'A' function")
Line 1,534:
(apply function (append args-1 args-2))))
(funcall (curry #'+ 1) 2)
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Cubescript}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Cubescript>
// No arguments
myfunction
Line 1,554:
if (strcmp $echo "") [echo builtin function] // true
if (strcmp $myfunction "") [echo builtin function] // false
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|D}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=d>import std.traits;
 
enum isSubroutine(alias F) = is(ReturnType!F == void);
Line 1,659:
alias foo6b = partial!(foo6, 5);
assert(foo6b(6) == 11);
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
<pre>true
Line 1,665:
 
=={{header|Dart}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=dart>void main() {
// Function definition
// See the "Function definition" task for more info
Line 1,694:
// Obtaining the return value of a function
var value = returnsValue();
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Delphi}}==
Line 1,701:
 
Calling a function without arguments and obtaining its return value:
<syntaxhighlight lang =delphi>foo()</langsyntaxhighlight>
Calling a function with optional arguments:
<syntaxhighlight lang =delphi>foo(1)</langsyntaxhighlight>
Calling a function with a variable number of arguments:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=delphi>foo(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)</langsyntaxhighlight>
Using a function in a statement context:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=delphi>writeLn('Hello world.');
foo;
writeLn('Goodbye world')</langsyntaxhighlight>
Like above, an empty parameter list, i. e. <tt>()</tt>, could be supplied too.
 
Line 1,715:
 
* Calling a function that requires no arguments
<syntaxhighlight lang =dragon>myMethod()</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments
<syntaxhighlight lang =dragon>myMethod(97, 3.14)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Dyalect}}==
Line 1,724:
Calling a function that requires no arguments:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Dyalect>func foo() { }
foo()</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Dyalect>func foo(x, y, z) { }
foo(1, 2, 3)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Calling a function with optional arguments:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Dyalect>func foo(x, y = 0, z = 1) { }
foo(1)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Calling a function with a variable number of arguments:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Dyalect>func foo(args...) { }
foo(1, 2, 3)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Calling a function with named arguments:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Dyalect>func foo(x, y, z) { }
foo(z: 3, x: 1, y: 2)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Using a function in statement context:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Dyalect>func foo() { }
if true {
foo()
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Using a function in first-class context within an expression:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Dyalect>func foo() { }
var x = if foo() {
1
} else {
2
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Obtaining the return value of a function:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Dyalect>func foo(x) { x * 2 }
var x = 2
var y = foo(x)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Distinguishing built-in functions and user-defined functions:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Dyalect>//Built-in functions are regular functions from an implicitly imported "lang" module
//There is no actual difference between these functions and user-defined functions
 
Line 1,781:
func foo() { } //A user-defined function
print(isBuiltin(foo)) //Prints: false
print(isBuiltin(assert)) //Prints: true</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Distinguishing subroutines and functions:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Dyalect>//There is no difference between subroutines and functions:
func foo() { } //doesn't explicitly return something (but in fact returns nil)
func bar(x) { return x * 2 } //explicitly returns value (keyword "return" can be omitted)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Stating whether arguments are passed by value or by reference:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Dyalect>//All arguments are passed by reference</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Is partial application possible and how:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Dyalect>//Using a closure:
func apply(fun, fst) { snd => fun(fst, snd) }
 
Line 1,809:
 
var sub3 = apply(flip(sub), 3)
x = sub3(9) //x is 6</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Déjà Vu}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=dejavu># all functions used are from the standard library
# calling a function with no arguments:
random-int
Line 1,843:
# partial application is not possible, due to the fact that
# a function's arity is a property of its behavior and not
# of its definition</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Elena}}==
ELENA 4.1:
Declaring closures
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=elena>
var c0 := { console.writeLine("No argument provided") };
var c2 := (int a, int b){ console.printLine("Arguments ",a," and ",b," provided") };
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
Calling a closure without arguments
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=elena>
c0();
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
Calling a closure with arguments
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=elena>
c2(2,4);
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
Passing arguments by reference:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=elena>
var exch := (ref object x){ x := 2 };
var a := 1;
exch(ref a);
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Elixir}}==
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=elixir>
# Anonymous function
 
Line 1,927:
end
end
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Erlang}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=erlang>
no_argument()
one_argument( Arg )
Line 1,943:
% Arguments are passed by reference, but you can not change them.
% Partial application is possible (a function returns a function that has one argument bound)
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|F Sharp|F#}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=fsharp>// No arguments
noArgs()
 
Line 1,988:
 
// Partial application example
let add2 = (+) 2</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Factor}}==
* Calling a word with no arguments:
<syntaxhighlight lang =Factor>foo</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Calling a word with a fixed number of arguments. This will pull as many objects as it needs from the stack. If there are not enough, it will result in a stack underflow.
<syntaxhighlight lang =Factor>foo</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* No special support for optional arguments.
 
* Variable arguments are achieved by defining a word that takes an integer, and operates on that many items at the top of the stack:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Factor>"a" "b" "c" 3 narray
! { "a" "b" "c" }</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* The named arguments idiom is to define a tuple, set its slots, and pass it to a word:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Factor><email>
"jack@aol.com" >>from
{ "jill@aol.com" } >>to
"Hello there" >>subject
body >>body
send-email</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* First-class context: this pushes a word to the stack. Use execute to evaluate.
<syntaxhighlight lang =Factor>\ foo</langsyntaxhighlight>
Additionally, you can put words directly inside sequences and quotations for deferred execution:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Factor>{ foo } [ foo ]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Obtaining the return value, which will be placed on the stack:
<syntaxhighlight lang =Factor>foo</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Returns true if the word is defined in the Factor VM as opposed to in a vocabulary. It should be noted that there are very few primitives.
<syntaxhighlight lang =Factor>\ foo primitive?</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Factor makes no distinction between subroutines and functions.
Line 2,027:
 
* Partial application is possible by use of curry. Here, the object 2 is curried into the left side of the quotation (anonymous function) <tt>[ - ]</tt>:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Factor>{ 1 2 3 } 2 [ - ] curry map .
! { -1 0 1 }</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Forth}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=forth>a-function \ requiring no arguments
a-function \ with a fixed number of arguents
a-function \ having optional arguments
Line 2,055:
: up ( n -- ) negate down ;
: right ( n -- ) 0 move ;
: left ( n -- ) negate right ;</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Fortran}}==
===Examples===
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Fortran>program main
implicit none
integer :: a
Line 2,129:
write(*,*) 'Output of subroutine: ', a
end subroutine
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
<pre>
Line 2,162:
As described in [[Naming_conventions#Fortran|Naming Conventions]], First Fortran (1958) allowed user-written functions but with restrictions on the names so that an ordinary variable called SIN would be disallowed because it was deemed to be in conflict with the library function SINF. These constraints were eased with Fortran II, and the rule became that a user could employ any correct-form name, such as SQRT, for a variable's name (simple or array) but then the library function SQRT would become inaccessible in such a routine. Similarly, there would be no point in the user writing a function called SQRT, because it could not be invoked - the compiler would take any invocation as being for the library routine SQRT. Thus, a user-written function could perhaps chance to have the name of an obscure (i.e. one forgotten about) library function, but if you were lucky it would have conflicting parameters and the compiler will complain.
 
A special case is provided by the "arithmetic statement function" that is defined after declarations but before executable statements in a routine and which has access to all the variables of the routine. Consider <langsyntaxhighlight lang=Fortran> REAL this,that
DIST(X,Y,Z) = SQRT(X**2 + Y**2 + Z**2) + this/that !One arithmetic statement, possibly lengthy.
...
D = 3 + DIST(X1 - X2,YDIFF,SQRT(ZD2)) !Invoke local function DIST.</langsyntaxhighlight>
In this case, even if "DIST" happened to be the name of some library function, invocations within the routine defining it would not be of the library function.
 
This flexibility in naming can be turned the other way around. For example, some compilers offer the intrinsic function SIND which calculates ''sine'' in degrees. Simply defining an array <code>REAL SIND(0:360)</code> (and properly initialising it) enables the slowish SIND function to be approximated by the faster indexing of an array. Put another way, an array is a function of a limited span of integer-valued arguments and is called in arithmetic expressions with the same syntax as is used for functions, be they intrinsic or user-written. Those writing in Pascal would be blocked by its insistence that arrays employ [] rather than (). Similarly, when testing, an array's declaration might be commented out and a function of that name defined, which function could check its arguments, write to a log file, note time stamps, or whatever else comes to mind. But alas, there is no "palindromic" or reverse-entry facility whereby a function could handle the assignment of a value ''to'' an array that would make this fully flexible.
 
Within a function there are some delicacies. The usual form is to assign the desired result to the name of the variable as in <code>H = A + B</code> where <code>H</code> is the name of the function. However, during evaluation the desired result might be developed over many stages and with reference to prior values. Suppose function H is to combine results from separate statements and it is not convenient to achieve this via one lengthy expression, perhaps because of conditional tests. Something like <langsyntaxhighlight lang=Fortran> H = A + B
IF (blah) H = 3*H - 7</langsyntaxhighlight>
As written, the appearance of <code>H</code> on the right-hand side of an expression does ''not'' constitute a call of function <code>H</code> at all. Some compilers fail to deal with this as hoped, and so one must use a scratch variable such as <code>FH</code> to develop the value, then remember to ensure that the assignment <code>H = FH</code> is executed before exiting the function, by whatever route. If the result is a large datum (a long character variable, say) this is annoying.
 
With the belated recognition of recursive possibilities (introduced by Algol in the 1960s) comes the possibility of a function invoking itself. In the above example, <code>H(3.7,5.5,6.6)</code> would clearly be a function invocation (because of the parentheses) whereas <code>H</code> would not be. Actually, Fortran routines have always been able to engage in recursion, it is just the returns that will fail - except on a stack-based system such as the Burroughs 6700 in the 1970s.
 
Fortran also offers the ability to pass a function as a parameter such that the recipient routine can call it, as in <langsyntaxhighlight lang=Fortran> REAL FUNCTION INTG8(F,A,B,DX) !Integrate function F.
EXTERNAL F !Some function of one parameter.
REAL A,B !Bounds.
Line 2,200:
WRITE (6,*) "Result=",INTG8(SIN, 0.0,8*ATAN(1.0),0.01)
WRITE (6,*) "Linear=",INTG8(TRIAL,0.0,1.0, 0.01)
END</langsyntaxhighlight>
This involves a fair amount of juggling special declarations so that the compiler will make the desired assumptions that a function is being called upon, rather than the value of some variable. This is eased somewhat with F90 onwards if the MODULE protocol is used so that at least you do not have to remember to declare INTG8 as REAL. Certain library functions are not allowed as candidates for passing to INTG8 (for instance, the compiler may render them as in-line code, bypassing the protocol used for functions) and arithmetic statement functions are usually rejected, as would be an array masquerading as a function. Arithmetic expressions are not allowable as possible "functions" either - how might something like <code>sin(x) + 3*sqrt(x) + 7</code> be recognised as a function instead? As <code>INTG8(SIN + 3*SQRT + 7,''etc...''</code>? Unlike Algol, Fortran does not offer the call-by-name facility as used in [[Jensen's_Device|Jensen's Device]], which would be something like <code>INTG8(SIN(X) + 3*SQRT(X) + 7,''etc...''</code> and would also require passing variable X. Perhaps a keyword BYNAME might be introduced one day. Until then a properly-named function must be declared and its name only be given. And of course, candidate functions must have the correct number and type of parameters, or else...
 
This works because Fortran passes parameters by reference (i.e. by giving the machine address of the entity), so that for functions, the code's entry point for the function is passed. With normal variables this means that a function (or subroutine) might modify the value of a parameter, as well as returning the function's result - and also mess with any COMMON data or other available storage, so a function EATACARD(IN) might read a line of data into a shared work area (called say ACARD) from I/O unit number IN and return ''true'', otherwise ''false'' should it hit end-of-file.
 
But it is also possible that parameters are passed via copy-in copy-out instead of by reference, with subtle changes in behaviour. This may also be done even on systems that do employ passing by reference. For instance, with <langsyntaxhighlight lang=Fortran> TYPE MIXED
CHARACTER*12 NAME
INTEGER STUFF
END TYPE MIXED
TYPE(MIXED) LOTS(12000)</langsyntaxhighlight>
One might hope to try <code>IT = BCHOP(LOTS.NAME,"Fred")</code> where BCHOP is a well-tested function for performing a binary search that should run swiftly. Alas, no. The successive values of NAME are not contiguous while BCHOP expects to receive an array of values that are contiguous - that is, with a "stride" of one. So, the compiler inserts code to copy all the LOTS.NAME elements into such a work area and passes the location of that to BCHOP (which searches it swiftly), then on return, the work area is copied back to LOTS.NAME just in case there had been a change. This latter can be avoided if within BCHOP its array is given the attribute INTENT(IN) for read-only but the incoming copy still means an effort of order N, while for the search the effort is just Log(N). This can have a less-than-subtle effect if large arrays are involved.
 
=={{header|Fortress}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=fortress>
component call_a_function
export Executable
Line 2,252:
end
end
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
 
=={{header|FreeBASIC}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=freebasic>
Sub Saludo()
Print "Hola mundo!"
Line 2,289:
?
testCadenas("1, 2, 3, 4, cadena, 6, 7, 8, \'incluye texto\'")
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
{{out}}
<pre>Hola mundo!
Line 2,308:
'''[https://gambas-playground.proko.eu/?gist=1bbbeb240f6fbca4b893271f1a19833b Click this link to run this code]'''<br>
Some of the uses of Procedures/Functions in Gambas
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=gambas>Public Sub Main()
 
Hello
Line 2,332:
Print "Hello world!"
 
End</langsyntaxhighlight>
Output:
<pre>
Line 2,343:
The following examples use functions from the standard packages
plus a few dummy local functions:
::<langsyntaxhighlight lang=go>import (
"image"
"image/gif"
Line 2,353:
func f() (int, float64) { return 0, 0 }
func g(int, float64) int { return 0 }
func h(string, ...int) {}</langsyntaxhighlight>
* Calling with no arguments and calling with a fixed number of arguments:
::<langsyntaxhighlight lang=go> f()
g(1, 2.0)
// If f() is defined to return exactly the number and type of
Line 2,363:
//h("fail", f())
// But this will:
g(g(1, 2.0), 3.0)</langsyntaxhighlight>
* Calling with a variable number of arguments:
::This is only possible with functions defined with a trailing optional/variable length argument of a single type (as <code>h</code> above). <langsyntaxhighlight lang=go> h("ex1")
h("ex2", 1, 2)
h("ex3", 1, 2, 3, 4)
Line 2,372:
h("ex4", list...)
// but again, not mixed with other arguments, this won't compile:
//h("fail", 2, list...)</langsyntaxhighlight>
* Optional arguments and named arguments are not supported.
::However, it is reasonably common to see a structure used for this. In this example <code>gif.Options</code> is a structure with multiple members which can initialized/assigned by name or omitted (or the whole third argument can just be <code>nil</code>). <langsyntaxhighlight lang=go> gif.Encode(ioutil.Discard, image.Black, &gif.Options{NumColors: 16})</langsyntaxhighlight>
* Optional arguments are supported.
::<langsyntaxhighlight lang=go>package main
 
import "fmt"
Line 2,389:
func main() {
fmt.Println(doIt(Params{a: 1, c: 9})) // prt 10
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
* Named arguments are supported.
::<langsyntaxhighlight lang=go>package main
 
import "fmt"
Line 2,405:
args["c"] = 1
bar(args["a"], args["b"], args["c"]) // prt 3, 2, 1
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
* Within a statement context.
::Assignment statements are shown later. Only functions returning a single value can be used in a single value context: <langsyntaxhighlight lang=go> if 2*g(1, 3.0)+4 > 0 {}</langsyntaxhighlight>
* In a first-class context:
::<langsyntaxhighlight lang=go> fn := func(r rune) rune {
if unicode.IsSpace(r) {
return -1
Line 2,417:
strings.Map(fn, "Spaces removed")
strings.Map(unicode.ToLower, "Test")
strings.Map(func(r rune) rune { return r + 1 }, "shift")</langsyntaxhighlight>
* Obtaining the value:
::<syntaxhighlight lang=text> a, b := f() // multivalue return
_, c := f() // only some of a multivalue return
d := g(a, c) // single return value
e, i := g(d, b), g(d, 2) // multiple assignment</langsyntaxhighlight>
* Built-in functions and user defined functions can not be distinguished.
::Functions from the standard packages look like any other. The few truly built-in functions are only different in that they have no package specifier like local functions (and they sometimes have extra capabilities). <langsyntaxhighlight lang=go> list = append(list, a, d, e, i)
i = len(list)</langsyntaxhighlight>
* Go has no subroutines, just functions and methods.
* Go arguments are passed by value.
::As with C, a pointer can be used to achieve the effect of reference passing. (Like pointers, slice arguments have their contents passed by reference, it's the slice header that is passed by value).
* Go arguments are passed by value or by reference
::<langsyntaxhighlight lang=go>package main
 
import "fmt"
Line 2,450:
fmt.Println("zeroptr:", i) // prt zeroptr: 0
fmt.Println("pointer:", &i) // prt pointer: 0xc0000140b8
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
* Partial and Currying is not directly supported.
::However something similar can be done, see [[Partial function application#Go]]
::<langsyntaxhighlight lang=go>package main
 
import "fmt"
Line 2,479:
partial := partialSum(13)
fmt.Println(partial(5)) //prt 18
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Groovy}}==
Line 2,489:
 
* Calling a function that requires no arguments
<syntaxhighlight lang =groovy>noArgs()</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=groovy>fixedArgs(1, "Zing", Color.BLUE, ZonedDateTime.now(), true)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Calling a function with optional arguments
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=groovy>optArgs("It's", "a", "beautiful", "day")
optArgs("It's", "a", "beautiful")
optArgs("It's", "a")
optArgs("It's")</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Calling a function with a variable number of arguments
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=groovy>varArgs("It's", "a", "beautiful", "day")
varArgs("It's", "a", "beautiful")
varArgs("It's", "a")
varArgs("It's")</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Calling a function with named arguments
Line 2,510:
 
* Using a function in statement context
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=groovy>def mean = calcAverage(1.2, 4.5, 3, 8.9, 22, 3)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Using a function in first-class context within an expression
** Create new functions from preexisting functions at run-time
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=groovy>def oldFunc = { arg1, arg2 -> arg1 + arg2 }
def newFunc = oldFunc.curry(30)
assert newFunc(12) == 42</langsyntaxhighlight>
** Store functions in collections
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=groovy>def funcList = [func1, func2, func3]</langsyntaxhighlight>
** Use functions as arguments to other functions
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=groovy>def eltChangeFunc = { it * 3 - 1 }
def changedList = list.collect(eltChangeFunc)</langsyntaxhighlight>
** Use functions as return values of other functions
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=groovy>def funcMaker = { String s, int reps, boolean caps ->
caps ? { String transString -> ((transString + s) * reps).toUpperCase() }
: { String transString -> (transString + s) * reps }
}
def func = funcMaker("a", 2, true)
assert func("pook") == "POOKAPOOKA"</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Obtaining the return value of a function
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=groovy>def retVal = func(x, y, z)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Distinguishing built-in functions and user-defined functions
Line 2,547:
=={{header|Haskell}}==
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=haskell>
-- Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments
multiply x y = x * y
Line 2,576:
-- Distinguishing subroutines and functions
-- Stating whether arguments are passed by value or by reference
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|i}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=i>//The type of the function argument determines whether or not the value is passed by reference or not.
//Eg. numbers are passed by value and lists/arrays are passed by reference.
 
Line 2,607:
end
}
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Icon}} and {{header|Unicon}}==
Line 2,621:
For more information see [[Icon%2BUnicon/Intro|Icon and Unicon Introduction on Rosetta]]
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Icon>procedure main() # demonstrate and describe function calling syntax and semantics
 
# normal procedure/function calling
Line 2,650:
f("x:=",1,"y:=",2) # named parameters (user defined)
end</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|J}}==
Line 2,658:
A verb, in J, typically supports two syntactic variants:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=j> verb noun
noun verb noun</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
And a noun, in J, is an array.
Line 2,665:
An argument list can be represented by an array. Thus, when dealing with multiple arguments, a typical form is:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =j> function argumentList</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Here, <code>function</code> is a verb and <code>argumentList</code> is a noun.
Line 2,671:
For example:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =j> sum(1,2,3)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Here <code>sum</code> is a verb and <code>(1,2,3)</code> is a noun.
Line 2,677:
Thus:
 
''A function that requires no arguments'' can be simulated by calling a function with empty argument list: <syntaxhighlight lang =j>f''</langsyntaxhighlight> Note that an empty list of characters is not the only constant in the language which is an empty list. That said, most operations in the language do not care what type of data is not present, in an array which contains nothing.
 
 
''A function with a fixed number of arguments'' gets special treatment in J when the fixed number is 1 or 2. <langsyntaxhighlight lang=j>f 'one argument'</langsyntaxhighlight>and <langsyntaxhighlight lang=j>'this example has two arguments' f 'the other argument'</langsyntaxhighlight> Alternatively, the function can be written such that an argument list is an error when it's the wrong length.
 
''A function with a variable number of arguments (varargs)'': See above.
 
If argument types conflict they will need to be put in boxes and the function will have to take its arguments out of the boxes. Here's an unboxed example with five arguments: <langsyntaxhighlight lang=j> f 1,2,3,4,5</langsyntaxhighlight> and here's a boxed example with five arguments: <langsyntaxhighlight lang=j>f (<1),(<2),(<3),(<4),(<5) </langsyntaxhighlight> Note that the last set of parenthesis is unnecessary <langsyntaxhighlight lang=j>f (<1),(<2),(<3),(<4),<5</langsyntaxhighlight> Note also that J offers some syntactic sugar for this kind of list <langsyntaxhighlight lang=j>f 1; 2; 3; 4; <5</langsyntaxhighlight>. Note also that if the last argument in a semicolon list is not boxed there is no need to explicitly box it, since that is unambiguous (it must be boxed so that it conforms with the other members of the list). <langsyntaxhighlight lang=j>f 1; 2; 3; 4; 5</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
''A function with named arguments'' can be accomplished by calling a function with the names of the arguments. <langsyntaxhighlight lang=j>f 'george';'tom';'howard'</langsyntaxhighlight> Other interpretations of this concept are also possible. For example, the right argument for a verb might be a list of argument names and the left argument might be a corresponding list of argument values: <langsyntaxhighlight lang=j>1 2 3 f 'george';'tom';'howard'</langsyntaxhighlight> Or, for example a function which requires an object could be thought of as a function with named arguments since an object's members have names:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=j> obj=: conew'blank'
george__obj=: 1
tom__obj=: 2
howard__obj=: 3
f obj
coerase obj</langsyntaxhighlight> Name/value pairs can also be used for this purpose and can be implemented in various ways, including passing names followed by values <langsyntaxhighlight lang=j>f 'george';1;'tom';2;'howard';3</langsyntaxhighlight> and passing a structure of pairs <langsyntaxhighlight lang=j>f ('george';1),('tom';2),:(howard';3)</langsyntaxhighlight> Or, for example, the pairs could be individually boxed: <langsyntaxhighlight lang=j>f ('george';1);('tom';2);<howard';3</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
''Using a function in command context'' is no different from using a function in any other context, in J. ''Using a function in first class context within an expression'' is no different from using a function in any other context, in J.
 
''Obtaining the return value of a function'' is no different from using a function in j. For example, here we add 1 to the result of a function: <syntaxhighlight lang =j>1 + f 2</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
The only ''differences that apply to calling builtin functions rather than user defined functions'' is spelling of the function names.
Line 2,705:
 
* Calling a function that requires no arguments
<syntaxhighlight lang =java>myMethod()</langsyntaxhighlight>
We didn't specify an object (or a class) as the location of the method, so <tt>this.myMethod()</tt> is assumed. This applies to all the following examples.
 
* Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments
<syntaxhighlight lang =java>myMethod(97, 3.14)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Calling a function with optional arguments
This is possible if the method name is overloaded with different argument lists. For example:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=java>int myMethod(int a, double b){
// return result of doing sums with a and b
}
Line 2,719:
int myMethod(int a){
return f(a, 1.414);
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
The compiler figures out which method to call based on the types of the arguments, so in this case the second argument appears to be optional. If you omit it, the value <tt>1.414</tt> is used.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=java>System.out.println( myMethod( 97, 3.14 ) );
System.out.println( myMethod( 97 ) );</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Calling a function with a variable number of arguments
This is possible if the method is defined with varargs syntax. For example:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=java>void printAll(String... strings){
for ( String s : strings )
System.out.println( s );
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
The type of <tt>strings</tt> is actually a string array, but the caller just passes strings:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=java>printAll( "Freeman" );
printAll( "Freeman", "Hardy", "Willis" );</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
To avoid ambiguity, only the last argument to a function can have varargs.
Line 2,740:
* Calling a function with named arguments
Not directly possible, but you could simulate this (somewhat verbosely):
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=java>int myMethod( Map<String,Object> params ){
return
((Integer)params.get("x")).intValue()
+ ((Integer)params.get("y")).intValue();
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Called like this:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=java>System.out.println( myMethod(new HashMap<String,Object>(){{put("x",27);put("y",52);}}) );</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Yuk.
Line 2,758:
 
* Obtaining the return value of a function
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=java>int i = myMethod(x);</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Distinguishing built-in functions and user-defined functions
Line 2,768:
* Stating whether arguments are passed by value or by reference
All arguments are passed by value, but since object variables contain a reference to an object (not the object itself), objects appear to be passed by reference. For example:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=java>myMethod(List<String> list){
// If I change the contents of the list here, the caller will see the change
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Is partial application possible and how
Line 2,779:
The arguments to a JavaScript function are stored in a special array-like object which does not enforce arity in any way; a function declared to take ''n'' arguments may be called with none‒and vice versa‒without raising an error.
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=JavaScript>var foo = function() { return arguments.length };
foo() // 0
foo(1, 2, 3) // 3</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Neither optional (see above) nor named arguments are supported, though the latter (and the inverse of the former) may be simulated with the use of a helper object to be queried for the existence and/or values of relevant keys. <span style="color: transparent;">Seriously, what is "statement context"?</span>
 
JavaScript functions are first-class citizens; they can be stored in variables (see above) and passed as arguments.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=JavaScript>var squares = [1, 2, 3].map(function (n) { return n * n }); // [1, 4, 9]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Naturally, they can also be returned, thus partial application is supported.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=JavaScript>
var make_adder = function(m) {
return function(n) { return m + n }
};
var add42 = make_adder(42);
add42(10) // 52</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Calling a user-defined function's <tt>toString()</tt> method returns its source verbatim; that the implementation is elided for built-ins provides a mechanism for distinguishing between the two.
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=JavaScript>foo.toString()
"function () { return arguments.length }"
alert.toString()
"function alert() { [native code] }"</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Arguments are passed by value, but the members of collections are essentially passed by reference and thus propagate modification.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=JavaScript>var mutate = function(victim) {
victim[0] = null;
victim = 42;
};
var foo = [1, 2, 3];
mutate(foo) // foo is now [null, 2, 3], not 42</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|jq}}==
Line 2,877:
 
=={{header|Julia}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Julia>
# Calling a function that requires no arguments:
f() = print("Hello world!")
Line 2,968:
v = [4, 6, 8]
map(x -> f(x, 10), v) # v = [30, 52, 82]
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Kotlin}}==
In Kotlin parameters are always passed by value though, apart from the (unboxed) primitive types, the value passed is actually a reference to an object.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=scala>// version 1.0.6
 
fun fun1() = println("No arguments")
Line 3,004:
println(fun7(11)) // calling function with a return type of Double (here explicit but can be implicit)
println(fun8("Hello")("world")) // partial application isn't supported though you can do this
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
{{out}}
Line 3,024:
=={{header|Lambdatalk}}==
In lambdatalk functions are abstractions {lambda {args} body} whose behaviour is best explained as a part of such a complete expression {{lambda {args} body} values}.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=scheme>
 
The command
Line 3,073:
 
More can be seen in http://lambdaway.free.fr/lambdawalks/?view=lambda
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
 
Line 3,083:
 
=== parentheses ===
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=langur>.x()
# call user-defined function</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=langur>write(.key, ": ", .value)
# call built-in with parentheses</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=== unbounded lists ===
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=langur>write .key, ": ", .value
# call built-in with unbounded list</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=langur>writeln "numbers: ", join ", ", [.a1, .a2, .a3, .a4]
# unbounded lists on writeln and join
# later function join takes remaining arguments</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=langur>writeln "numbers: ", join(", ", [.a1, .a2, .a3, .a4]), " === "
# unbounded list on writeln
# join using parentheses so it doesn't take remaining arguments</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=langur>val .sum = foldfrom(
f(.sum, .i, .c) .sum + toNumber(.c, 36) x .weight[.i],
0,
Line 3,107:
split ZLS, .code,
)
# split, pseries, and len using unbounded lists, ending before comma preceding line return</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=langur>for .key in sort(keys .tests) {
...
}
# unbounded list on keys bounded by closing parenthesis of sort</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Latitude}}==
Line 3,118:
Like Ruby, Latitude doesn't have functions in the traditional sense, only methods. Methods can be called with parentheses, as in many languages. If a method takes no arguments, the parentheses may be omitted. If a method takes a single argument and that argument is a literal (such as a literal number or string), then the parentheses may also be omitted. Additionally, Latitude provides an alternative syntax for method calls which replaces the parentheses with a colon.
 
<syntaxhighlight lang=text>foo (1, 2, 3). ; (1) Ordinary call
foo (). ; (2) No arguments
foo. ; (3) Equivalent to (2)
Line 3,124:
foo 1. ; (5) Equivalent to (4)
foo (bar). ; (6) Parentheses necessary here since bar is not a literal
foo: 1, 2, 3. ; (7) Alternative syntax, equivalent to (1)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Although methods themselves can be passed around as first-class values, the method evaluation semantics often make such an approach suboptimal. If one needs a first-class function in the traditional sense, the usual approach is to wrap it in a <code>Proc</code> object and then call it explicitly as needed.
 
<syntaxhighlight lang=text>myProc := proc { foo. }.
myProc call (1, 2, 3).</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
If you want to write a function which can accept either a <code>Proc</code> or a method object (as many standard library functions do, for convenience), you may use the <code>shield</code> method to ensure that the object is a <code>Proc</code>. <code>shield</code> wraps methods in a <code>Proc</code> while leaving objects which are already procedures alone.
 
<syntaxhighlight lang=text>myProc1 := #'foo shield.
myProc2 := proc { foo. }.
myProc3 := proc { foo. } shield.</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
All three of the above procedures will act the same.
Line 3,144:
 
In some module, define the following:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lisp>
(defun my-func()
(: io format '"I get called with NOTHING!~n"))
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
Then you use it like so (depending upon how you import it):
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lisp>
> (my-func)
I get called with NOTHING!
ok
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
'''Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments:'''
In some module, define the following:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lisp>
(defun my-func(a b)
(: io format '"I got called with ~p and ~p~n" (list a b)))
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
Then you use it like so:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lisp>
> (my-func '"bread" '"cheese")
I got called with "bread" and "cheese"
ok
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
'''Calling a function with optional arguments or calling a function with a variable number of arguments:'''
Line 3,176:
* One can define multiple functions so that it ''appears'' that one is calling a function with optional or a variable number of arguments:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lisp>
(defmodule args
(export all))
Line 3,191:
(defun my-func (a b c)
(: io format '"~p ~p ~p~n" (list a b c)))
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
Here is some example usage:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lisp>
> (slurp '"args.lfe")
#(ok args)
Line 3,211:
> (my-func '"apple" '"banana" '"cranberry" '"bad arg")
exception error: #(unbound_func #(my-func 4))
</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
'''Calling a function with named arguments:'''
Line 3,221:
 
'''Using a function in statement context:'''
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lisp>
...
(cond ((== count limit) (hit-limit-func arg-1 arg-2))
((/= count limit) (keep-going-func count)))
...
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
'''Using a function in first-class context within an expression:'''
 
From the LFE REPL:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lisp>
> (>= 0.5 (: math sin 0.5))
true
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
'''Obtaining the return value of a function:'''
 
There are many, many ways to assign function outputs to variables in LFE. One fairly standard way is with the <code>(let ...)</code> form:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lisp>
(let ((x (: math sin 0.5)))
...)
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
'''Distinguishing built-in functions and user-defined functions:'''
Line 3,269:
 
=={{header|Liberty BASIC}}==
<syntaxhighlight lang=lb>
<lang lb>
'Call a function - Liberty BASIC
 
Line 3,312:
'Is partial application possible and how
'impossible
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Lingo}}==
 
*Calling a function that requires no arguments
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lingo>foo()
-- or alternatively:
call(#foo, _movie)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lingo>foo(1,2,3)
-- or alternatively:
call(#foo, _movie, 1, 2, 3)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Calling a function with optional arguments
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lingo>on foo (a, b)
if voidP(b) then b = 1
return a * b
end</langsyntaxhighlight>
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lingo>put foo(23, 2)
-- 46
put foo(23)
-- 23</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Calling a function with a variable number of arguments
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lingo>on sum ()
res = 0
repeat with i = 1 to the paramCount
Line 3,343:
end repeat
return res
end</langsyntaxhighlight>
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lingo>put sum (1,2,3)
-- 6</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Calling a function with named arguments
Line 3,353:
*Using a function in first-class context within an expression
Lingo has no first-class functions, but the call(...) syntax (see above) allows to identify and use functions specified as "symbols" (e.g. #foo). This allows some "first-class alike" features:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lingo>----------------------------------------
-- One of the five native iterative methods defined in ECMAScript 5
-- @param {list} tList
Line 3,372:
on doubleInt (n)
return n*2
end</langsyntaxhighlight>
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lingo>l = [1,2,3]
put map(l, #doubleInt)
-- [2, 4, 6]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Obtaining the return value of a function
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lingo>x = foo(1,2)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Distinguishing built-in functions and user-defined functions
In Lingo all user-defined (global) functions are 'methods' of the _movie object, and there is AFAIK no direct way to distinguish those from _movie's built-in functions. But by iterating over of all movie scripts in all castlibs you can get a complete list of all user-defined (global) functions, and then any function not in this list is a built-in function:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lingo>on getAllUserFunctions ()
res = []
repeat with i = 1 to _movie.castlib.count
Line 3,398:
end repeat
return res
end</langsyntaxhighlight>
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lingo>put getAllUserFunctions()
-- [#sum, #double, #getAllUserFunctions]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Distinguishing subroutines and functions
Line 3,407:
*Stating whether arguments are passed by value or by reference
In lingo 'objects' are always passed by reference, all other types (e.g. strings, integers, floats) by value. 'Objects' are e.g. lists (arrays), property lists (hashes), images and script instances. The built-in function objectP() returns TRUE (1) for objects and FALSE (0) for non-objects. To prevent the effects of call-by-reference, some object types (lists, property lists and images) support the method duplicate() to clone the object before passing it to a function:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lingo>on double (someList)
cnt = someList.count
repeat with i = 1 to cnt
someList[i] = someList[i] * 2
end repeat
end</langsyntaxhighlight>
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lingo>l = [1,2,3]
double(l)
put l
Line 3,421:
double(l.duplicate())
put l
-- [1, 2, 3]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Little}}==
Line 3,428:
local fuctions.
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=C>// Calling a function that requires no arguments
void foo() {puts("Calling a function with no arguments");}
foo();
Line 3,462:
puts (a);
puts (b);
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Lua}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lua>-- Lua functions accept any number of arguments; missing arguments are nil-padded, extras are dropped.
function fixed (a, b, c) print(a, b, c) end
fixed() --> nil nil nil
Line 3,497:
-- There is no separate notion of subroutines
-- Built-in functions are not easily distinguishable from user-defined functions
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Luck}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=luck>/* Calling a function that requires no arguments */
f();;
 
Line 3,542:
 
/* Is partial application possible and how */
tasty_curry(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)(l)(m)(n)(o)(p)(q)(r)(s)(t)(u)(v)(w)(x)(y)(z);;</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|M2000 Interpreter}}==
Line 3,631:
 
=={{header|Maple}}==
Calling a function with no arguments:<syntaxhighlight lang =Maple> f()</langsyntaxhighlight>
Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Maple>f(1,sin(x), g -> int(g(t),t=0..1)</langsyntaxhighlight>
Calling a function with optional arguments: <langsyntaxhighlight lang=Maple>f(1, sin(x), g -> int(g(t),t=0..1)</langsyntaxhighlight>
Calling a function with a variable number of arguments: <langsyntaxhighlight lang=Maple>f(1, sin(x), g -> int(g(t),t=0..1)</langsyntaxhighlight>
Calling a function with named arguments:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Maple>f(a,b,method = foo)</langsyntaxhighlight>
Calling a function in a statements context:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Maple>f(a); f(b);</langsyntaxhighlight>
Using a function in first-class context within an expression:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Maple>f(a) + g(b)</langsyntaxhighlight>
Obtaining the return value of a function:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Maple> x := f(1)</langsyntaxhighlight>
Distinguishing built-in functions and user-defined functions:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Maple>> type( op, 'builtin' );
true
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
Distinguishing subroutines and functions: There is no distinction.
 
Line 3,652:
=={{header|Mathematica}} / {{header|Wolfram Language}}==
Calling a function that requires no arguments:
<syntaxhighlight lang =Mathematica>f[]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments:
<syntaxhighlight lang =Mathematica>f[1,2]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Calling a function with optional arguments:
<syntaxhighlight lang =Mathematica>f[1,Option1->True]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Calling a function with a variable number of arguments:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Mathematica>f[1,Option1->True]
f[1,Option1->True,Option2->False]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Calling a function with named arguments:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Mathematica>f[Option1->True,Option2->False]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Using a function in statement context:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Mathematica>f[1,2];f[2,3]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Using a function in first-class context within an expression:
<syntaxhighlight lang =Mathematica>(#^2)&[3];</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
The return value of a function can be formally extracted using Return[]
Line 3,679:
 
=={{header|MATLAB}} / {{header|Octave}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Matlab>
% Calling a function that requires no arguments
function a=foo();
Line 3,729:
% Stating whether arguments are passed by value or by reference
% arguments are passed by value, however Matlab has delayed evaluation, such that a copy of large data structures are done only when an element is written to.
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Nanoquery}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=nanoquery>// function with no arguments
no_args()
 
Line 3,749:
catch
println "func is a built-in or doesn't exist"
end</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Nemerle}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Nemerle>// no arguments
f()
 
Line 3,808:
def h = f(_, 2)
def a = g(3) // equivalent to: def a = f(2, 3)
def b = h(3) // equivalent to: def b = f(3, 2)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Nim}}==
Translated from Python, when possible:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=nim>proc no_args() =
discard
# call
Line 3,854:
let x = return_something(19) + 10
let y = 19.return_something() + 10
let z = 19.return_something + 10</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|OCaml}}==
Line 3,860:
* Calling a function that requires no arguments:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =ocaml>f ()</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
(In fact it is impossible to call a function without arguments, when there are no particular arguments we provide the type <code>unit</code> which is a type that has only one possible value. This type is mainly made for this use.)
Line 3,866:
* Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =ocaml>f 1 2 3</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Calling a function with optional arguments:
Line 3,872:
For a function that has this signature:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ocaml>val f : ?a:int -> int -> unit</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
here is how to call it with or without the first argument omited:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ocaml>f 10
f ~a:6 10</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Due to partial application, an optional argument always has to be followed by a non-optional argument. If the function needs no additional arguments then we use the type <code>unit</code>:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ocaml>g ()
g ~b:1.0 ()</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Calling a function with a variable number of arguments:
Line 3,894:
Named arguments are called '''labels'''.
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =ocaml>f ~arg:3</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
If a variable has the same name than the label we can use this simpler syntax:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ocaml>let arg = 3 in
f ~arg</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Using a function in statement context:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang =ocaml>(* TODO *)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Using a function in first-class context within an expression:
Line 3,911:
* Obtaining the return value of a function:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ocaml>let ret = f ()
let a, b, c = f () (* if there are several returned values given as a tuple *)
let _ = f () (* if we want to ignore the returned value *)
let v, _ = f () (* if we want to ignore one of the returned value *)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Distinguishing built-in functions and user-defined functions:
Line 3,941:
 
If f is a function and c b a ares objects :
<syntaxhighlight lang =Oforth>a b c f</langsyntaxhighlight>
will push c then b then a on the stack then call f. Calling f does not describe if f will use 1, 2 or 3 arguments (or none).
 
Oforth adds a notation to describe parameters used by a function. It is only a way to add information about which parameters will be used by f :
<syntaxhighlight lang =Oforth>f(a, b, c)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Intepreter will replace this second syntax by the first one. It is only "sugar"...
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Oforth>a b c f
a b f(c)
a f(b, c)
f(a, b, c)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
are the same call to function f and the interpreter will translate all of them into the first one. Which parameters are really used by f will depend on f implementation.
Line 3,958:
Methods need a receiver (the object on which the method will apply and the object that will pushed on th stack when self is used into the method body).
The receiver must be on the top of the stack before calling the method. If a, b, c and r are objects and m a method :
<syntaxhighlight lang =Oforth>a b c r m</langsyntaxhighlight>
will call m with r as its receiver.
It is also possible to use the same "sugar" notation used by functions :
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Oforth>r m(a, b, c)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Ol}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=scheme>
; note: sign "==>" indicates expected output
 
Line 4,103:
;;; Stating whether arguments are passed by value or by reference
; The values in Ol always passed as values and objects always passed as references. If you want to pass an object copy - make a copy by yourself.
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|ooRexx}}==
This is to show how a built-in function is invoked when an internal function on the dame name in present.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=oorexx>say 'DATE'()
Say date()
Exit
daTe: Return 'my date' </langsyntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
<pre>H:\>rexx fdate
Line 4,122:
 
Functions can be used when statements would be expected without change.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=parigp>f(); \\ zero arguments
sin(Pi/2); \\ fixed number of arguments
vecsort([5,6]) != vecsort([5,6],,4) \\ optional arguments
Line 4,128:
call(Str, ["gg", 1, "hh"]) \\ variable number of arguments in a vector
(x->x^2)(3); \\ first-class
x = sin(0); \\ get function value</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Built-in functions are like user-defined functions in current versions. In older versions built-in functions cannot be passed as closures.
Line 4,138:
 
Calling a nullary function and obtaining its return value:
<syntaxhighlight lang =pascal>foo</langsyntaxhighlight>
Calling an n-ary function (n ≥ 1) and obtaining its return value:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=pascal>foo(1, 'abc', true)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Following are not possible in Pascal as defined by the ISO standards (ISO 7185 and ISO 10206).
Line 4,154:
=={{header|Perl}}==
The most common syntax; simply calls the function foo on the argument(s) provided.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=perl>foo(); # Call foo on the null list
&foo(); # Ditto
foo($arg1, $arg2); # Call foo on $arg1 and $arg2
&foo($arg1, $arg2); # Ditto; ignores prototypes</langsyntaxhighlight>
Call foo() as a bareword. Only works after the function has been declared, which
can be done normally or with the use subs pragma.
<syntaxhighlight lang =perl>foo;</langsyntaxhighlight>
Call foo() with the current values of @_<syntaxhighlight lang =perl>&foo;</langsyntaxhighlight>
Call foo() with the current values of @_, discarding the previous stack frame. Not your grandfather's (harmful) goto, although the keyword can do both.<syntaxhighlight lang =perl>goto &foo;</langsyntaxhighlight>
For subroutines stored in references (anonymous subroutines).<langsyntaxhighlight lang=perl>&$fooref('foo', 'bar');
&{$fooref}('foo', 'bar');
$fooref->('foo', 'bar');</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Phix}}==
Line 4,173:
* Phix does not allow implicit discard of function results. The explicit discard statement takes the form
 
<!--<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Phix>-->
<span style="color: #0000FF;">{<span style="color: #0000FF;">}</span> <span style="color: #0000FF;">=</span> <span style="color: #000000;">myfunction<span style="color: #0000FF;">(<span style="color: #0000FF;">)
<!--</langsyntaxhighlight>-->
 
* This is in fact a simple contraction of standard multiple assigment (which can be nested as deeply as you like):
 
<!--<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Phix>-->
<span style="color: #0000FF;">{<span style="color: #000000;">cities<span style="color: #0000FF;">,<span style="color: #000000;">populations<span style="color: #0000FF;">}</span> <span style="color: #0000FF;">=</span> <span style="color: #7060A8;">columnize<span style="color: #0000FF;">(<span style="color: #000000;">muncipalities<span style="color: #0000FF;">)</span>
<span style="color: #0000FF;">{<span style="color: #0000FF;">{<span style="color: #0000FF;">}<span style="color: #0000FF;">,<span style="color: #000000;">populations<span style="color: #0000FF;">}</span> <span style="color: #0000FF;">=</span> <span style="color: #7060A8;">columnize<span style="color: #0000FF;">(<span style="color: #000000;">muncipalities<span style="color: #0000FF;">)</span> <span style="color: #000080;font-style:italic;">-- discard result[1]</span>
<span style="color: #0000FF;">{<span style="color: #000000;">cities<span style="color: #0000FF;">,<span style="color: #0000FF;">{<span style="color: #0000FF;">}<span style="color: #0000FF;">}</span> <span style="color: #0000FF;">=</span> <span style="color: #7060A8;">columnize<span style="color: #0000FF;">(<span style="color: #000000;">muncipalities<span style="color: #0000FF;">)</span> <span style="color: #000080;font-style:italic;">-- discard result[2]</span>
<span style="color: #0000FF;">{<span style="color: #000000;">cities<span style="color: #0000FF;">}</span> <span style="color: #0000FF;">=</span> <span style="color: #7060A8;">columnize<span style="color: #0000FF;">(<span style="color: #000000;">muncipalities<span style="color: #0000FF;">)</span> <span style="color: #000080;font-style:italic;">-- ""
<!--</langsyntaxhighlight>-->
* Calling a function with no parameters still requires the "()" empty argument list.
* Optional arguments are denoted simply by the presence of a default, and must be grouped on the right:
 
<!--<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Phix>-->
<span style="color: #008080;">function</span> <span style="color: #000000;">myfunction<span style="color: #0000FF;">(<span style="color: #004080;">integer</span> <span style="color: #000000;">a<span style="color: #0000FF;">,</span> <span style="color: #004080;">string</span> <span style="color: #000000;">b<span style="color: #0000FF;">=<span style="color: #008000;">"default"<span style="color: #0000FF;">)</span>
<span style="color: #008080;">return</span> <span style="color: #0000FF;">{<span style="color: #000000;">a<span style="color: #0000FF;">,<span style="color: #000000;">b<span style="color: #0000FF;">}</span>
Line 4,195:
<span style="color: #0000FF;">?<span style="color: #000000;">myfunction<span style="color: #0000FF;">(<span style="color: #000000;">1<span style="color: #0000FF;">)</span> <span style="color: #000080;font-style:italic;">-- displays {1,"default"}</span>
<span style="color: #0000FF;">?<span style="color: #000000;">myfunction<span style="color: #0000FF;">(<span style="color: #000000;">2<span style="color: #0000FF;">,<span style="color: #008000;">"that"<span style="color: #0000FF;">)</span> <span style="color: #000080;font-style:italic;">-- displays {2,"that"}
<!--</langsyntaxhighlight>-->
 
* Sequence parameters can be of any length, which is another way to implement optional/variable number of arguments.
* Named arguments can be specified in any order, with an error if any non-optional parameters are missing:
 
<!--<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Phix>-->
<span style="color: #0000FF;">?<span style="color: #000000;">myfunction<span style="color: #0000FF;">(<span style="color: #000000;">b<span style="color: #0000FF;">:=<span style="color: #008000;">"then"<span style="color: #0000FF;">,<span style="color: #000000;">a<span style="color: #0000FF;">:=<span style="color: #000000;">3<span style="color: #0000FF;">)</span> <span style="color: #000080;font-style:italic;">-- displays {3,"then"}
--?myfunction(b:="though") -- compile-time error
<!--</langsyntaxhighlight>-->
 
* The programmer is free to use either positional parameters or named parameters, or a mixture of both (with positional parameters first).
* Phix support first-class functions directly, as integers, along with an older routine_id mechanism:
 
<!--<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Phix>-->
<span style="color: #008080;">constant</span> <span style="color: #004080;">integer</span> <span style="color: #000000;">r_myfunction</span> <span style="color: #0000FF;">=</span> <span style="color: #7060A8;">routine_id<span style="color: #0000FF;">(<span style="color: #008000;">"myfunction"<span style="color: #0000FF;">)<span style="color: #0000FF;">,</span>
<span style="color: #000000;">first_class</span> <span style="color: #0000FF;">=</span> <span style="color: #000000;">myfunction</span>
Line 4,215:
<span style="color: #0000FF;">?<span style="color: #7060A8;">call_func<span style="color: #0000FF;">(<span style="color: #000000;">first_class<span style="color: #0000FF;">,<span style="color: #0000FF;">{<span style="color: #000000;">1<span style="color: #0000FF;">}<span style="color: #0000FF;">)</span> <span style="color: #000080;font-style:italic;">-- ""</span>
<span style="color: #0000FF;">?<span style="color: #000000;">first_class<span style="color: #0000FF;">(<span style="color: #000000;">1<span style="color: #0000FF;">)</span> <span style="color: #000080;font-style:italic;">-- ""
<!--</langsyntaxhighlight>-->
 
The value of r_my_func can be passed as an argument to any routine, or stored in a table, and invoked in a similar fashion.<br>
Line 4,225:
* All arguments are passed by reference with copy-on-write semantics: to modify the value of a parameter you must both return and assign it, as in:
 
<!--<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Phix>-->
<span style="color: #000000;">s</span> <span style="color: #0000FF;">=</span> <span style="color: #7060A8;">append<span style="color: #0000FF;">(<span style="color: #000000;">s<span style="color: #0000FF;">,<span style="color: #000000;">item<span style="color: #0000FF;">)
<!--</langsyntaxhighlight>-->
 
* Implicit forward calls are supported, as are optional explicit forward declarations, which can occasionally cure compilation error messages.
 
=={{header|Phixmonti}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Phixmonti>def saludo
"Hola mundo" print nl
enddef
Line 4,238:
saludo
 
getid saludo exec</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|PicoLisp}}==
When calling a funcion in PicoLisp directly (does this mean "in a statement context"?), it is always surrounded by parentheses, with or without arguments, and for any kind of arguments (evaluated or not):
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=PicoLisp>(foo)
(bar 1 'arg 2 'mumble)</langsyntaxhighlight>
When a function is used in a "first class context" (e.g. passed to another function), then it is not yet '''called'''. It is simply '''used'''. Technically, a function can be either a '''number''' (a built-in function) or a '''list''' (a Lisp-level function) in PicoLisp):
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=PicoLisp>(mapc println Lst) # The value of 'printlin' is a number
(apply '((A B C) (foo (+ A (* B C)))) (3 5 7)) # A list is passed</langsyntaxhighlight>
Any argument to a function may be evaluated or not, depending on the function. For example, 'setq' evaluates every second argument
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=PicoLisp>(setq A (+ 3 4) B (* 3 4))</langsyntaxhighlight>
i.e. the first argument 'A' is not evaluated, the second evaluates to 7, 'B' is not evaluated, then the fourth evaluates to 12.
 
=={{header|PureBasic}}==
{{trans|FreeBASIC}}
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=PureBasic>Procedure Saludo()
PrintN("Hola mundo!")
EndProcedure
Line 4,290:
 
Input()
CloseConsole()</langsyntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
<pre>Same as FreeBASIC entry.</pre>
Line 4,297:
=={{header|Python}}==
Under the hood all Python function/method parameters are named. All arguments can be passed as ''name=value'' pairs or as a dictionary containing such pairs using the ''myfunc('''**key_args''')'' (apply over dictionary) syntax). One can also "apply" a function over a sequence of arguments using the syntax: ''myfunc('''*args''')'' as noted in comments below. Parameters can be mixed so long parameters with default values (optional arguments) follow any "positional" (required) parameters, and catchall parameter ('''''*args''''') follow those, and any "keyword arguments' parameter" is last. (Any function can only have up to one "catchall" or '''''*args'''' parameter and up to one "keyword args" '''''**kwargs''''' parameter).
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=python>def no_args():
pass
# call
Line 4,366:
 
## For partial function application see:
## http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Partial_function_application#Python</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
 
Line 4,373:
{{works with|QuickBasic|4.5}}
{{trans|FreeBASIC}}
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=qbasic>FUNCTION Copialo$ (txt$, siNo, final$)
DIM nuevaCadena$
Line 4,404:
CALL testNumeros(1, 2, 0)
PRINT
CALL testCadenas("1, 2, 3, 4, cadena, 6, 7, 8, \'incluye texto\'")</langsyntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
<pre>
Line 4,449:
=={{header|R}}==
Translated from Python, when possible.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=rsplus>### Calling a function that requires no arguments
no_args <- function() NULL
no_args()
Line 4,506:
 
### Is partial application possible and how
# Yes, see http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Partial_function_application#R</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Racket}}==
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Racket>
#lang racket
 
Line 4,549:
(curry foo 1 2) ; later apply this on 3
(λ(x) (foo 1 2 x)) ; a direct way of doing the same
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Raku}}==
Line 4,563:
Calling a function that requires no arguments:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang=raku perl6line>foo # as list operator
foo() # as function
foo.() # as function, explicit postfix form
Line 4,570:
&foo() # as object invocation
&foo.() # as object invocation, explicit postfix
::($name)() # as symbolic ref</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Calling a function with exactly one argument:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang=raku perl6line>foo 1 # as list operator
foo(1) # as named function
foo.(1) # as named function, explicit postfix
Line 4,586:
1.foo() # as method via dispatcher
1."$name"() # as method via dispatcher, symbolic
+1 # as operator to prefix:<+> function</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Method calls are included here because they do eventually dispatch to a true
Line 4,608:
Calling a function with exactly two arguments:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang=raku perl6line>foo 1,2 # as list operator
foo(1,2) # as named function
foo.(1,2) # as named function, explicit postfix
Line 4,620:
1.foo(2) # as method via dispatcher
1."$name"(2) # as method via dispatcher, symbolic
1 + 2 # as operator to infix:<+> function</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Optional arguments don't look any different from normal arguments.
Line 4,627:
Calling a function with a variable number of arguments (varargs):
 
<syntaxhighlight lang=raku perl6line>foo @args # as list operator
foo(@args) # as named function
foo.(@args) # as named function, explicit postfix
Line 4,639:
1.foo(@args) # as method via dispatcher
1."$name"(@args) # as method via dispatcher, symbolic
@args X @blargs # as list infix operator to infix:<X></langsyntaxhighlight>
Note: whether a function may actually be called with a variable number of arguments depends entirely
on whether a signature accepts a list at that position in the argument list, but
Line 4,645:
foo function is declared with a signature of the form (*@params). The calls above might be interpreted as having a single array argument if the signature indicates a normal parameter instead of a variadic one. What you cannot do in Raku (unlike Perl 5) is pass an array as several fixed arguments. By default it must either represent a single argument, or be part of a variadic list. You can force the extra level of argument list interpolation using a prefix <tt>|</tt> however:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang=raku perl6line>my @args = 1,2,3;
foo(|@args); # equivalent to foo(1,2,3)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Calling a function with named arguments:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang=raku perl6line>foo :a, :b(4), :!c, d => "stuff"
foo(:a, :b(4), :!c, d => "stuff")</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
...and so on. Operators may also be called with named arguments, but only
colon adverbials are allowed:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang=raku perl6line>1 + 1 :a :b(4) :!c :d("stuff") # calls infix:<+>(1,1,:a, :b(4), :!c, d => "stuff")</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Using a function in statement context:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang=raku perl6line>foo(); bar(); baz(); # evaluate for side effects</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Using a function in first class context within an expression:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang=raku perl6line>1 / find-a-func(1,2,3)(4,5,6) ** 2;</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Obtaining the return value of a function:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang=raku perl6line>my $result = somefunc(1,2,3) + 2;</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
There is no difference between calling builtins and user-defined functions and operators (or
Line 4,681:
===Practice===
Demonstrating each of the above-mentioned function calls with actual running code, along with the various extra definitions required to make them work (in certain cases). Arguments are checked, and function name / run-sequence number are displayed upon success.
<syntaxhighlight lang=raku perl6line>{
state $n;
 
Line 4,771:
f(|@args); # 45 equivalent to f(1,2,3)
 
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
<pre>f1 f2 i3 f4 f5 f6 f7 f8 f9 f10 l11 f12 f13 f14 f15 f16 f17 j18 j19 j20 f21 f22 m23 f24 f25 f26 f27 f28 f29 k30 k31 k32 f33 f34 n35 f36 f37 g38 g39 g40 g41 h42 h43 h44 f45</pre>
Line 4,777:
=={{header|REXX}}==
===version 1===
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=rexx>/*REXX pgms demonstrates various methods/approaches of invoking/calling a REXX function.*/
 
/*╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
Line 4,795:
errmsg= '***error***' /*an error message eyecatcher string. */
if arg() \== 0 then say errmsg "the YEARFUNC function won't accept arguments."
return left( date('Sorted'), 3)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=rexx> /*╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments. ║
║ ║
Line 4,822:
end
 
return a1 + a2 + a3 + a4</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=rexx> /*╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Calling a function with optional arguments. ║
║ ║
Line 4,842:
end /*j*/
 
return $</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=rexx> /*╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Calling a function with a variable number of arguments. ║
║ ║
Line 4,871:
call value 'COMMON.'name,val
end
return arg()</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=rexx> /*╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Calling a function in statement context. ║
║ ║
Line 4,889:
yr= yearFunc() + 20
say 'two decades from now, the year will be:' yr
exit /*stick a fork in it, we're all done. */</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=rexx> /*╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Obtaining the return value of a function. ║
║ ║
Line 4,902:
 
call yearFunc
say 'the current year is' result /*result can be RESULT, it is caseless.*/</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=rexx> /*╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Distinguishing built-in functions and user-defined functions. ║
║ ║
Line 4,922:
 
date: return 4 /*Bob only "went out" 4 times, no need */
/* to actually count, he quit after 4. */</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=rexx> /*╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Distinguishing subroutines and functions. ║
║ ║
Line 4,948:
║ are: map (f 1 9) [1..9] ║
║ or: map (f(1,_,9)) [1, ..., 9] ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝*/</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
===version 2===
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=rexx>/* REXX ***************************************************************
* 29.07.2013 Walter Pachl trying to address the task concisely
***********************************************************************
Line 5,027:
If sigl=39 Then
Say 'fb cannot be invoked as function (it does not return a value'
Exit</langsyntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
<pre>
Line 5,067:
 
=={{header|Ring}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ring>
hello()
func hello
see "Hello from function" + nl
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ring>
first() second()
func first see "message from the first function" + nl
func second see "message from the second function" + nl
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ring>
sum(3,5) sum(1000,2000)
func sum x,y see x+y+nl
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ring>
# this program will print the hello world message first then execute the main function
See "Hello World!" + nl
func main
see "Message from the main function" + nl
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Ruby}}==
Line 5,095:
 
*Calling a function that requires no arguments
:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ruby>def foo() p "foo" end
 
foo #=> "foo"
foo() #=> "foo"</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Calling a function with a fixed number of arguments
:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ruby>def foo arg; p arg end # one argument
 
foo(1) #=> 1
foo "1" #=> "1"
foo [0,1,2] #=> [0, 1, 2] (one Array)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Calling a function with optional arguments
:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ruby>def foo(x=0, y=x, flag=true) p [x,y,flag] end
 
foo #=> [0, 0, true]
foo(1) #=> [1, 1, true]
foo(1,2) #=> [1, 2, true]
foo 1,2,false #=> [1, 2, false]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Calling a function with a variable number of arguments
:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ruby>def foo(*args) p args end
 
foo #=> []
foo(1,2,3,4,5) #=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Calling a function with named arguments
:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ruby>def foo(id:0, name:"", age:0) p [id, name, age] end
 
foo(age:22, name:"Tom") #=> [0, "Tom", 22]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Using a function in statement context
Line 5,134:
 
*Obtaining the return value of a function
:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ruby>def foo(a,b) a + b end
 
bar = foo 10,20
Line 5,145:
x,y = sum_and_product(3,5)
p x #=> 8
p y #=> 15</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Distinguishing built-in functions and user-defined functions
Line 5,155:
::These methods are called without a receiver and thus can be called in functional form.
 
::<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ruby>puts "OK!" # Kernel#puts
raise "Error input" # Kernel#raise
Integer("123") # Kernel#Integer
Line 5,166:
private # Module#private
require # Kernel#require
loop { } # Kernel#loop</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
*Stating whether arguments are passed by value or by reference
Line 5,180:
::The block argument sends a closure from the calling scope to the method.
::The block argument is always last when sending a message to a method. A block is sent to a method using <code>do ... end</code> or <code>{ ... }</code>.
::<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ruby>class Array
def sum(init=0, &blk)
if blk
Line 5,193:
p ary.sum #=> 15
p ary.sum(''){|n| (-n).to_s} #=> "-1-2-3-4-5"
p (ary.sum do |n| n * n end) #=> 55</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
:Splat operator:
::You can turn an Array into an argument list with * (or splat) operator.
::<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ruby>def foo(a,b,c) p [a,b,c] end
 
args = [1,2,3]
foo *args #=> [1, 2, 3]
args = [1,2]
foo(0,*args) #=> [0, 1, 2]</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
:Syntax sugar:
::In Ruby, many operators are actually method calls.
::<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ruby># return value substance
i = 3
p 1 + i #=> 4 1.+(i)
Line 5,218:
p a & [4,2] #=> [2] a.&([4,2])
p "abcde"[1..3] #=> "bcd" "abcde".[](1..3)
p "%2d %4s" % [1,"xyz"] #=> " 1 xyz" "%2d %4s".%([1,"xyz"])</langsyntaxhighlight>
::Method call which was displayed in the comment is usable actually.
 
=={{header|Rust}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=rust>fn main() {
// Rust has a lot of neat things you can do with functions: let's go over the basics first
fn no_args() {}
Line 5,312:
 
 
}</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Scala}}==
{{libheader|Scala}}
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Scala>def ??? = throw new NotImplementedError // placeholder for implementation of hypothetical methods
def myFunction0() = ???
myFunction0() // function invoked with empty parameter list
Line 5,380:
 
// No distinction between built-in functions and user-defined functions
// No distinction between subroutines and functions</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Seed7}}==
Line 5,389:
* All parameters are positional.
 
* There are no differences between between calling built-in vs. user defined functions.<langsyntaxhighlight lang=seed7>env := environment; # Call a function that requires no arguments.
env := environment(); # Alternative possibility to call of a function with no arguments.
cmp := compare(i, j); # Call a function with a fixed number of arguments.</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* There are no optional arguments, but a similar effect can be achieved with overloading.<langsyntaxhighlight lang=seed7>write(aFile, "asdf"); # Variant of write with a parameter to specify a file.
write("asdf"); # Variant of write which writes to the file OUT.</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Seed7 does not support functions with a variable number of arguments. But a function argument can be an array with as many values as you want:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=seed7>const func integer: sum (in array integer: intElems) is func
result
var integer: sum is 0;
Line 5,408:
 
s := sum([] (1, 2, 3)); # Use an aggregate to generate an array.
t := sum([] (2, 3, 5, 7));</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Concatenation operators can be used to concatenate arguments. This solution is used to provide the write function:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=seed7>write("Nr: " <& num); # Use operators to concatenate arguments.</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* The procedure ignore can be used to ignore a return value.<langsyntaxhighlight lang=seed7>ignore(getln(IN)); # Using a function in statement context (ignore the result).</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Call-by-name parameters use a function in first-class context. The function [http://seed7.sourceforge.net/examples/map.htm doMap] from the examples section of the Seed7 homepage uses a given expression to modify the elements of an array:<langsyntaxhighlight lang=seed7>seq := doMap([](1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 12, 16), x, succ(x));</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|SenseTalk}}==
* If no variable is specified, `put` prints the variable to stdout
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=sensetalk>put zeroArgsFn()
 
// Function calls can also be made using the following syntax:
Line 5,426:
put "This function was run with zero arguments."
return "Return value from zero argument function"
end zeroArgsFn</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Running a function requires a keyword such as `put; if no variable is return, put into e.g. _
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=sensetalk>put TwoArgFn("variable", (3, 4)) into _
 
// Alternatively, the function can be called like so:
Line 5,443:
put "2 argument function: arg1 = " & arg1 & "; arg2 = " & arg2
put "Parameters = " & the parameterList
end TwoArgFn</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* A parameter is set to "" if nothing is specified
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=sensetalk>get ThreeArgFn("variable", (3, 4))
 
function ThreeArgFn arg1, arg2, arg3
put "3 argument function: arg1 = " & arg1 & "; arg2 = " & arg2 & "; arg3 = " & arg3
end ThreeArgFn</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Using this, default parameter values can be set up if a check if done at the start of the function
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=sensetalk>get OneArgFn() -- arg1 is 5
get OneArgFn(10) -- arg1 is now 10
 
Line 5,461:
end if
put "One argument function; arg1 = " & arg1
end OneArgFn</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* All variables are, by default, passed by value
* If the argument prefixed by 'container', the variable is passed by reference
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=sensetalk>put 3 into a
get AddOne(a)
put "Value of a = " & a
Line 5,477:
function AddOne n
add 1 to n
end AddOne</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
SenseTalk also distinguishes between functions and subroutines, which it calls handlers:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=sensetalk>CustomHandler 1, 2, 3
// Prints: 1 - 2 - 3
 
to handle CustomHandler arg1, arg2, arg3
put arg1 && "-" && arg2 && "-" && arg3
end CustomHandler</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Subroutines can be called as a command, without storing the output
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=sensetalk>
MyCommand 1, "variable", (4, 5, 6)
 
Line 5,494:
...
end MyCommand
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
Functions/subroutines can also be defined with the to, on or function keywords:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=sensetalk>to MyFn args
...
end MyFn
Line 5,508:
...
end args
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Sidef}}==
All functions in Sidef are first-class closures
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ruby>foo(); # without arguments
foo(1, 2); # with two arguments
foo(args...); # with a variable number of arguments
Line 5,521:
 
var arr = [1,2,3];
foo(arr); # the arguments are passed by object-reference</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
Partial application is possible by using a curry function:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ruby>func curry(f, *args1) {
func (*args2) {
f(args1..., args2...);
Line 5,536:
 
var adder = curry(add, 1);
say adder(3); #=>4</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Smalltalk}}==
Where f is a closure and arguments is an array of values for f to operate on.
<syntaxhighlight lang =smalltalk>f valueWithArguments: arguments.</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|SSEM}}==
Line 5,546:
 
This code fragment, beginning (for the sake of argument) at address 10, performs a Wheeler jump to a subroutine beginning at address 20. The return address is coded in negative (two's complement) form because the SSEM negates values in the process of loading them into the accumulator. As always on the SSEM, jump targets are one less than the actual intended target: this is because the CI ("Current Instruction") register is incremented after an instruction has been executed rather than before.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ssem>00110000000000100000000000000000 10. -12 to c
10110000000000000000000000000000 11. 13 to CI
11001111111111111111111111111111 12. -13
11001000000000000000000000000000 13. 19</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Swift}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Swift>// call a function with no args
noArgs()
 
Line 5,586:
 
// getting a bunch of return values, discarding second returned value
let (foo, _, baz) = returnSomeValues()</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Tcl}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=tcl>aCallToACommandWithNoArguments
aCallToACommandWithOne argument
aCallToACommandWith arbitrarily many arguments
Line 5,595:
aCallToACommandWith -oneNamed argument -andAnother namedArgument
aCallToACommandWith theNameOfAnotherCommand
aCallToOneCommand [withTheResultOfAnother]</langsyntaxhighlight>
Tcl does differentiate between functions and other types of commands in expressions:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=tcl>expr {func() + [cmd]}
expr {func(1,2,3} + [cmd a b c]}</langsyntaxhighlight>
However, there are no deep differences between the two: functions are translated into commands that are called in a particular namespace (thus <tt>foo()</tt> becomes <tt>tcl::mathfunc::foo</tt>).
There are no differences in usage between built-in commands and user-defined ones, and parameters are passed to commands by value conceptually (and read-only reference in the implementation).
Line 5,605:
=={{header|True BASIC}}==
{{trans|FreeBASIC}}
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=qbasic>FUNCTION Copialo$ (txt$, siNo, final$)
FOR cont = 1 TO ROUND(siNo)
LET nuevaCadena$ = nuevaCadena$ & txt$
Line 5,635:
PRINT
CALL testCadenas("1, 2, 3, 4, cadena, 6, 7, 8, \'incluye texto\'")
END</langsyntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
<pre>
Line 5,646:
In the shell, there are no argument specifications for functions. Functions obtain their arguments using the positional parameter facilities and functions are simply called by name followed by any arguments that are to be passed:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=sh>sayhello # Call a function in statement context with no arguments
multiply 3 4 # Call a function in statement context with two arguments</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
The shell does not support the use of named parameters. There is no lookahead in the shell, so functions cannot be called until their definition has been run.
 
=={{header|VBA}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=vb>'definitions/declarations
 
'Calling a function that requires no arguments
Line 5,781:
End Sub
</langsyntaxhighlight>{{out}}
<pre>no arguments ok
no arguments ok
Line 5,799:
 
=={{header|WDTE}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=wdte>let noargs => + 2 5;
noargs -- print;
 
Line 5,818:
# evaluates `+ 3` and then passes 7 to the resulting partially applied
# function.
(+ 3) 7 -- print;</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|WebAssembly}}==
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=webassembly>(func $main (export "_start")
 
(local $result i32)
Line 5,852:
(i32.const 8)
)
)</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|Wren}}==
Line 5,881:
Here are some examples:
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=ecmascript>var f1 = Fn.new { System.print("Function 'f1' with no arguments called.") }
var f2 = Fn.new { |a, b|
System.print("Function 'f2' with 2 arguments called and passed %(a) & %(b).")
Line 5,913:
mc1.x = 42 // change mc1's field using setter
System.print(-mc1.x) // invoke prefix operator -
System.print(mc1 + mc2) // invoke infix operator +</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
{{out}}
Line 5,927:
 
=={{header|XLISP}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=lisp>; call a function (procedure) with no arguments:
(foo)
 
Line 5,945:
; or it can simply be discarded
(foo bar)
; nothing is done with the return value</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|XSLT}}==
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=xml><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="1.0">
<xsl:output method="xml" indent="yes"/>
Line 6,226:
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Yabasic}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=Yabasic>
sub test(a, b, c) : print a, b, c : end sub
 
Line 6,247:
 
test$("1, 2, 3, 4, text, 6, 7, 8, \"include text\"")
print</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|zkl}}==
Line 6,253:
 
Using f has a function, method or object:
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=zkl>f(); f(1,2,3,4);
fcn f(a=1){}() // define and call f, which gets a set to 1
fcn{vm.arglist}(1,2,3,4) // arglist is L(1,2,3,4)
Line 6,262:
s:=f()
fcn{}.isType(self.fcn) //True
fcn{}.len.isType(self.fcn) //False, len is a Method</langsyntaxhighlight>
Partial application is done with the .fp* methods or the 'wrap keyword
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=zkl>
fcn(a,b,c).fp(1)() // call function with a always set to 1
fcn(a,b,c).fp1(2,3)() // call function with b & c always set to 2 & 3
Line 6,274:
 
a:=5; f('wrap(b){a+b}) // 'wrap is syntactic sugar for .fpN
// to create a lexical closure --> f(fcn(b,a){a+b}.fpN(1,a))</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
=={{header|zonnon}}==
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=zonnon>
module CallingProcs;
type
Line 6,333:
writeln(total);
end CallingProcs.
</syntaxhighlight>
</lang>
 
=={{header|Z80 Assembly}}==
Line 6,341:
 
* Functions that take a fixed number of arguments usually require the programmer to load the arguments into registers or push them to the stack prior to calling the function.
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=z80>PackNibbles:
;input: B = top nibble, C = bottom nibble. Outputs to accumulator.
;usage: B = &0X, C = &0Y, => A = &XY
Line 6,351:
RLCA
OR C
RET</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Assembly language in general has difficulty with optional and variable numbers of arguments (unless it is written by a compiler, of course). Prior to the function call, an optional argument would most likely be set to zero if intended to be unused in a particular instance of a function.
Line 6,361:
* Getting a function's return value depends on how it was programmed. The concept of "return values" is a high-level construct that isn't enforced by assembly languages in general, and Z80 is no exception. The programmer is free to choose which register or section of memory the return value of a function is stored, if one even exists. Generally speaking the accumulator is usually used for this purpose but it depends on the data type as well as the needs of the program.
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=z80>AddTwoNumbers
;input registers: A,B. Outputs to A.
ADD a,b
RET</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
* Some implementations of Z80 Assembly have built-in functions. These are essentially just subroutines located in ROM at a specific memory address. Functions stored in low memory can be called with the <code>RST #</code> instruction. Anything in high memory will need to be <code>CALL</code>ed like any other user-created subroutine. On the Amstrad CPC, <code>CALL &BB5A</code> will print the accumulator to the screen as an ASCII character.
Line 6,374:
On the ZX Spectrum, functions and subroutines are separate entities. A function is limited to being a single expression that generates a return value. Statements are not allowed within a function. A subroutine can perform input and output and can contain statements.
 
<langsyntaxhighlight lang=zxbasic>10 REM functions cannot be called in statement context
20 PRINT FN a(5): REM The function is used in first class context. Arguments are not named
30 PRINT FN b(): REM Here we call a function that has no arguments
Line 6,385:
100 PRINT SIN(50): REM here we pass a parameter to a builtin function
110 PRINT RND(): REM here we use a builtin function without parameters
120 RANDOMIZE: REM statements are not functions and cannot be used in first class context.</langsyntaxhighlight>
 
{{omit from|GUISS}}
10,333

edits