Abundant odd numbers: Difference between revisions
→{{header|RPL}}: run times.
(add RPL) |
(→{{header|RPL}}: run times.) |
||
Line 5,920:
=={{header|RPL}}==
{{works with|Hewlett-Packard|50g}}
≪ DUP DIVIS ∑LIST SWAP DUP + ≥
≫ '<span style="color:blue">ABUND?</span>' STO
Line 5,949 ⟶ 5,950:
3: { "945*2 < 1920" "1575*2 < 3224" "2205*2 < 4446" "2835*2 < 5808" "3465*2 < 7488" "4095*2 < 8736" "4725*2 < 9920" "5355*2 < 11232" "5775*2 < 11904" "5985*2 < 12480" "6435*2 < 13104" "6615*2 < 13680" "6825*2 < 13888" "7245*2 < 14976" "7425*2 < 14880" "7875*2 < 16224" "8085*2 < 16416" "8415*2 < 16848" "8505*2 < 17472" "8925*2 < 17856" "9135*2 < 18720" "9555*2 < 19152" "9765*2 < 19968" "10395*2 < 23040" "11025*2 < 22971" }
2: "492975*2 < 1012336"
1: "1000000575*2 < 2083561584"
</pre>
Abundant odd numbers are far from being abundant. It tooks 16 minutes to run TASK1 on an HP-50g calculator and 28 minutes to run TASK2 on an iOS emulator.
=={{header|Ruby}}==
| |||