Abstract type: Difference between revisions

m
sort omit tags
No edit summary
m (sort omit tags)
Line 14:
'''Task''': show how an abstract type can be declared in the language. If the language makes a distinction between interfaces and partially implemented types illustrate both.
 
{{omit from|Modula-2}}
 
=={{header|ABAP}}==
Line 1,212 ⟶ 1,211:
{{omit from|Fortran}}
{{omit from|Factor|Factor is a dynamic language. You could of course do the solution of python/ruby (throw exceptions for unimplemented methods)}}
{{omit from|Falcon|Does not support the concept of an abstract type.}}
{{omit from|gnuplot}}
{{omit from|Integer BASIC}}
Line 1,222:
{{omit from|Metafont}}
{{omit from|ML/I}}
{{omit from|Modula-2}}
{{omit from|MOO}}
{{omit from|NSIS}}
Line 1,229 ⟶ 1,230:
{{omit from|Scratch}}
{{omit from|TI-89 BASIC|Does not have static or user-defined types.}}
{{omit from|Falcon|Does not support the concept of an abstract type.}}
{{omit from|UNIX Shell}}
{{omit from|ZX Spectrum Basic}}
Anonymous user