Anonymous user
Abstract type: Difference between revisions
→{{header|Standard ML}}
imported>Regattaguru |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1,012:
=={{header|EMal}}==
{{trans|Go}}
<syntaxhighlight lang="
^|EMal
|but can use interfaces.
|^
Line 3,267:
Then say we have a structure ListQueue which implements queues as lists. If we write <tt>ListQueue :> QUEUE</tt>
then the queue type will be abstract, but if we write <tt>ListQueue : QUEUE</tt> or <tt>ListQueue : LIST_QUEUE</tt> it won't.
=={{header|Swift}}==
Swift uses Protocols to provide abstract type features. See [https://docs.swift.org/swift-book/documentation/the-swift-programming-language/protocols/ the docs]
A trivial example showing required properties and methods, and the means of providing a default implementation.
<syntaxhighlight lang="sml">
protocol Pet {
var name: String { get set }
var favouriteToy: String { get set }
func feed() -> Bool
func stroke() -> Void
}
extension Pet {
// Default implementation must be in an extension, not in the declaration above
func stroke() {
print("default purr")
}
}
struct Dog: Pet {
var name: String
var favouriteToy: String
// Required implementation
func feed() -> Bool {
print("more please")
return false
}
// If this were not implemented, the default from the extension above
// would be called.
func stroke() {
print("roll over")
}
}
</syntaxhighlight>
=={{header|Tcl}}==
Line 3,422 ⟶ 3,463:
The Go example, when rewritten in Wren, looks like this.
<syntaxhighlight lang="
class Beast{
| |||