Talk:Truncatable primes: Revision history

14 September 2012

• curprev 17:3617:36, 14 September 2012‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ m 9,168 bytes +62‎ →‎redefinition of truncatable primes: sign
• curprev 17:3517:35, 14 September 2012‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 9,106 bytes +406‎ →‎redefinition of truncatable primes: External conversations should make allowances for the base of any work they refer to.
• curprev 12:1012:10, 14 September 2012‎ Nigel Galloway talk contribs‎ 8,700 bytes +269‎ →‎redefinition of truncatable primes
• curprev 12:0112:01, 14 September 2012‎ Nigel Galloway talk contribs‎ 8,431 bytes +408‎ →‎redefinition of truncatable primes

13 September 2012

• curprev 06:5406:54, 13 September 2012‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 8,023 bytes +940‎ →‎redefinition of truncatable primes: More of my guff :-)

12 September 2012

• curprev 23:0523:05, 12 September 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 7,083 bytes +778‎ →‎redefinition of truncatable primes: added commentary on other sequences that assume base ten. -- ~~~~
• curprev 22:4622:46, 12 September 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 6,305 bytes +2,532‎ →‎redefinition of truncatable primes: dear, cheap, rare, hateful numbers, and then some. -- ~~~~
• curprev 21:4821:48, 12 September 2012‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 3,773 bytes +491‎ →‎redefinition of truncatable primes: Hmmm.
• curprev 20:0320:03, 12 September 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 3,282 bytes +4‎ →‎redefinition of truncatable primes: indicated Latin phrase of ''per se''. -- ~~~~
• curprev 19:5919:59, 12 September 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 3,278 bytes +552‎ →‎redefinition of truncatable primes: added comment about truncatable primes in base ten. -- ~~~~
• curprev 18:3818:38, 12 September 2012‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 2,726 bytes +389‎ →‎redefinition of truncatable primes: Yea but ...
• curprev 16:1716:17, 12 September 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 2,337 bytes +521‎ added a new section [==redefinition of truncatable primes==]. -- ~~~~

18 May 2011

• curprev 14:3714:37, 18 May 2011‎ rosettacode>Dkf‎ m 1,816 bytes −4‎ Small tidying
• curprev 12:2212:22, 18 May 2011‎ rosettacode>Mwn3d‎ 1,820 bytes +217‎ →‎Phantom Category: seems like the right way.
• curprev 11:2611:26, 18 May 2011‎ rosettacode>Dgamey‎ m 1,603 bytes +335‎ →‎Phantom Category: caused by Haskell Library reference
• curprev 11:1111:11, 18 May 2011‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ 1,268 bytes +76‎ →‎Phantom Category
• curprev 11:1111:11, 18 May 2011‎ rosettacode>Dgamey‎ m 1,192 bytes +5‎ →‎Phantom Category: ref don't link to cat Prime numbers
• curprev 10:2910:29, 18 May 2011‎ rosettacode>Dgamey‎ 1,187 bytes +556‎ Category cleanup troubles - help

3 January 2011

• curprev 02:3802:38, 3 January 2011‎ rosettacode>Billymac00‎ m 631 bytes +156‎ →‎OEIS: new section

9 September 2010

• curprev 03:2703:27, 9 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 475 bytes +228‎ →‎Is Zero allowed?: Nope.
• curprev 00:5800:58, 9 September 2010‎ Tikkanz talk contribs‎ 247 bytes +247‎ Created page with '== Is Zero allowed? == I think the task should explicitly state whether zero is allowed in the numbers or not. If allowed then 999907 is the largest left-truncatable prime less t…'