Talk:Quaternion type: Revision history

22 September 2016

• curprev 21:4121:41, 22 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 15,868 bytes +743‎ Formula for norm of quaternion made invisible by under-tested cosmetic edit at 20:52, 6 July 2016

11 August 2014

• curprev 08:1708:17, 11 August 2014‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ m 15,125 bytes +1‎ →‎=Julia outdated w.r.t. imag?: Whoops.
• curprev 08:1608:16, 11 August 2014‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 15,124 bytes +352‎ →‎Imaginary parts (plural): Julia outdated w.r.t. imag?

10 August 2014

• curprev 20:3420:34, 10 August 2014‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 14,772 bytes +50‎ →‎Imaginary parts (plural): Julia has an update...
• curprev 20:2620:26, 10 August 2014‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 14,722 bytes +161‎ →‎Imaginary parts (plural): Moved...
• curprev 20:0820:08, 10 August 2014‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ m 14,561 bytes +90‎ →‎Imaginary parts (plural): (sign)
• curprev 20:0820:08, 10 August 2014‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 14,471 bytes +116‎ →‎Imaginary parts (plural): Julia library writers.
• curprev 19:5219:52, 10 August 2014‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 14,355 bytes +324‎ →‎Imaginary parts (plural): Que?
• curprev 19:3019:30, 10 August 2014‎ Peak talk contribs‎ 14,031 bytes −4‎ →‎Imaginary parts (plural)
• curprev 19:2819:28, 10 August 2014‎ Peak talk contribs‎ 14,035 bytes +1,356‎ →‎Imaginary parts (plural)
• curprev 18:4918:49, 10 August 2014‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ m 12,679 bytes −3‎ →‎Imaginary parts (plural): how would imag be used?
• curprev 18:4818:48, 10 August 2014‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 12,682 bytes +449‎ →‎Imaginary parts (plural): how would imagine be used?
• curprev 17:4817:48, 10 August 2014‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ m 12,233 bytes +5‎ grammar
• curprev 17:4717:47, 10 August 2014‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ 12,228 bytes +634‎ →‎Imaginary parts (plural)
• curprev 15:3015:30, 10 August 2014‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 11,594 bytes +278‎ →‎Imaginary parts (plural)

28 October 2013

• curprev 20:2420:24, 28 October 2013‎ rosettacode>Arbautjc‎ 11,316 bytes +115‎ →‎Why is it so complicated?
• curprev 19:4619:46, 28 October 2013‎ rosettacode>Arbautjc‎ 11,201 bytes +139‎ →‎Why is it so complicated?

2 May 2013

• curprev 22:0222:02, 2 May 2013‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ m 11,062 bytes +22‎ →‎Why is it so complicated?
• curprev 17:1617:16, 2 May 2013‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ 11,040 bytes +1,291‎ →‎Why is it so complicated?
• curprev 10:2710:27, 2 May 2013‎ Grondilu talk contribs‎ 9,749 bytes +832‎ new section: why so complicated?

15 July 2012

• curprev 07:2507:25, 15 July 2012‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ m 8,917 bytes +105‎ No edit summary
• curprev 07:1807:18, 15 July 2012‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 8,812 bytes +223‎ →‎ooRexx: new section

8 May 2011

• curprev 15:1415:14, 8 May 2011‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ 8,589 bytes +261‎ →‎Ruby and subtraction
• curprev 12:2812:28, 8 May 2011‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 8,328 bytes +825‎ →‎Ruby and subtraction

10 March 2011

• curprev 00:0900:09, 10 March 2011‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 7,503 bytes +377‎ →‎E language limitations

3 February 2011

• curprev 20:0320:03, 3 February 2011‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 7,126 bytes +123‎ →‎Name: Move it? Of course.
• curprev 20:0120:01, 3 February 2011‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ m 7,003 bytes 0‎ moved Talk:Simple quaternion type and operations to Talk:Quaternion type: More focused/less verbose title.
• curprev 19:5019:50, 3 February 2011‎ rosettacode>Kevin Reid‎ 7,003 bytes +213‎ →‎Name: new section

1 December 2010

• curprev 08:2908:29, 1 December 2010‎ rosettacode>Dkf‎ m 6,790 bytes 0‎ moved Talk:Simple Quaternion type and operations to Talk:Simple quaternion type and operations: capitalization policy

6 August 2010

• curprev 18:4018:40, 6 August 2010‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 6,790 bytes +78‎ →‎ADA Issue?: Ta!
• curprev 18:3118:31, 6 August 2010‎ rosettacode>Dmitry-kazakov‎ 6,712 bytes +134‎ →‎ADA Issue?: Fixed
• curprev 18:2318:23, 6 August 2010‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 6,578 bytes +92‎ →‎ADA Issue?: And the same applies to Algol 68
• curprev 18:2118:21, 6 August 2010‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 6,486 bytes +258‎ →‎ADA Issue?

4 August 2010

• curprev 10:4010:40, 4 August 2010‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 6,228 bytes +208‎ →‎What simple properties should become part of the task?: Rotation psuedocode
• curprev 07:2007:20, 4 August 2010‎ rosettacode>Dkf‎ 6,020 bytes +245‎ →‎What simple properties should become part of the task?: What about rotations?
• curprev 05:1605:16, 4 August 2010‎ rosettacode>NevilleDNZ‎ m 5,775 bytes +631‎ →‎What simple properties should become part of the task?: With '''compl'''[ex] numbers such a test could be to check that exp(πi)=-1. Is there an equivalent for Quaternions?
• curprev 04:2404:24, 4 August 2010‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 5,144 bytes +311‎ →‎What simple properties should become part of the task?
• curprev 01:4701:47, 4 August 2010‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ 4,833 bytes +435‎ Basically: yes

3 August 2010

• curprev 23:0123:01, 3 August 2010‎ MikeMol talk contribs‎ 4,398 bytes +369‎ →‎Why a draft project?: I like the task.
• curprev 22:5822:58, 3 August 2010‎ MikeMol talk contribs‎ 4,029 bytes +558‎ →‎Why a draft project?: Ah.
• curprev 19:4819:48, 3 August 2010‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ m 3,471 bytes +12‎ No edit summary
• curprev 19:4319:43, 3 August 2010‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ m 3,459 bytes +18‎ No edit summary
• curprev 19:4219:42, 3 August 2010‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ 3,441 bytes +1,271‎ quaternions are not so general
• curprev 19:2419:24, 3 August 2010‎ rosettacode>NevilleDNZ‎ m 2,170 bytes +717‎ →‎Why a draft project?
• curprev 18:0518:05, 3 August 2010‎ MikeMol talk contribs‎ 1,453 bytes +358‎ →‎Why a draft project?: What I was thinking
• curprev 16:2816:28, 3 August 2010‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 1,095 bytes +344‎ →‎Why a draft project?
• curprev 15:2415:24, 3 August 2010‎ MikeMol talk contribs‎ 751 bytes +451‎ Sounds interesting to me.
• curprev 13:2413:24, 3 August 2010‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 300 bytes +300‎ →‎hy a draft project?