Talk:Exponentiation with infix operators in (or operating on) the base

From Rosetta Code

Title too confused and long

Suggest work out an acceptable option and then change the task name. --Paddy3118 (talk) 05:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Looks to me like the actual task is: "Demonstrate operator precedence" using exponentiation and unary negation as its required operators. I would propose "Operator precedence" as a task title... but that's just me. --Thundergnat (talk) 13:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

what should non infix languages do?

--Paddy3118 (talk) 05:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Talk:Exponentiation_with_infix_operators_in_(or_operating_on)_the_base?oldid=303516"