Anonymous user
Category talk:Unicon: Difference between revisions
→Works With (To Use or Not To Use): Works with not needed if using header for both language names
(→Works With (DO NOT USE): reversed decision on using works with) |
(→Works With (To Use or Not To Use): Works with not needed if using header for both language names) |
||
Line 147:
'''If you are cleaning up the Icon/Unicon headers, please don't remove the either and add a works with. Works with appears not to add the task to the language so the category pages will be wrong. As far as I can tell the correct way is to use Works with AND to use both headers in a single line.''' Thanks (Someone in a well intended cleanup effort introduced some of these and dropped the Unicon header).
:You definitely don't need the works with template if you're using the header template for both language names. The header templates will add the task to the language categories. The works with template will only link back to the Unicon page (already linked to by the header). --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 16:39, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
The template suggests this may be incorrect usage, see [[Template:Works_with]]. Specifically it says "Do not use this template to merely indicate what language implementation you used, ''but only if the example relies on features only a particular implementation/variant has.''"
| |||