Talk:JSON

Some considerations about a Guile scheme JSON implementation

Hi, guys! I would like to say that I have written a solution in Guile scheme which you can check up at https://github.com/Flurando/json (The admin can safely delete this link if posting a link to other non-free websites is not allowed here). However there are many shortcomings of my solution, like security, efficiency, and tolerance. It works as intended for the most time, but for JSON objects like {}, ["some", "thing",], it would fail--namely my solution can't handle comma without being followed by other objects, and it cannot deal with {}, in a way that my decode doesn't accept it and my encode can't generate this, also by the way it can read numbers like 3e5 but it can't generate that, always 300000.0 instead sadly. I just wonder if it is okey for me to paste my toy solution here as a Guile scheme slot, or have I fix these "bugs"? Or just use a random guile library like the most answers on this page?