| Display title | Category talk:CAPI |
| Default sort key | CAPI |
| Page length (in bytes) | 208 |
| Namespace ID | 15 |
| Namespace | Category_talk |
| Page ID | 2476 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Page views in the past month | 0 |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | rosettacode>Kevin Reid |
| Date of page creation | 22:55, 5 August 2009 |
| Latest editor | rosettacode>Kevin Reid |
| Date of latest edit | 22:55, 5 August 2009 |
| Total number of edits | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | I feel like CAPI ought to be considered a language (dialect/implementation) feature, not a library. (It exists only as part of LispWorks.) Thoughts? --Kevin Reid... |
