Village Pump:Home/Syntax Highlighting ( archived 2009-06-18 ): Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (Yes, there will be changes) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Will we need to go and change all of the previous highlighting then? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 06:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC) |
:Will we need to go and change all of the previous highlighting then? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 06:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
::Yes. Both approaches will be supported for a little while, I expect, but the current system will definitely be phased out. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 23:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC) |
::Yes. Both approaches will be supported for a little while, I expect, but the current system will definitely be phased out. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 23:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
:::Isn't it possible to access the raw files behind the Wiki, so one could run a simple replace operation on all of them? Also, is there any way to add syntax highlighting for languages for which it isn't supported yet? --[[User:Dirkt|Dirkt]] 11:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:07, 6 July 2008
I'm going to make some major changes to the Syntax Highlighting extension this weekend. Instead of denoting a block of C code as:
<C>(some code)</C>
Code will be denoted as:
<code lang="C">(some code)<code>
This will significantly clean up the Mediawiki extension namespace, and make formatting tricks with CSS easier. I'd rather create an attribute to <pre>, but that appears as though it could be more complicated. --Short Circuit 05:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Will we need to go and change all of the previous highlighting then? --Mwn3d 06:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. Both approaches will be supported for a little while, I expect, but the current system will definitely be phased out. --Short Circuit 23:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Isn't it possible to access the raw files behind the Wiki, so one could run a simple replace operation on all of them? Also, is there any way to add syntax highlighting for languages for which it isn't supported yet? --Dirkt 11:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. Both approaches will be supported for a little while, I expect, but the current system will definitely be phased out. --Short Circuit 23:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)