I'm working on modernizing Rosetta Code's infrastructure. Starting with communications. Please accept this time-limited open invite to RC's Slack.. --Michael Mol (talk) 20:59, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

User talk:Sekoia

From Rosetta Code

Welcome to Rosetta Code! I'm Mike, and I noticed you created an account.

Some quick things you should be aware of:

Template:Mylang Helps you show what languages you're familiar with, and helps us become aware of skills with languages we haven't seen.
Category:Unimplemented tasks by language A place to find tasks missing solutions in various languages.
Blogs, twitter, facebook... We have them, and are interested in yours.
Special:Webchat Logs you into #rosettacode on the Freenode IRC channel. Not usually the most active communications medium, but occasionally helpful. It's logged at http://irclog.perlgeek.de/rosettacode/today.
Rosetta Code:Village Pump A general Q/A and discussion area.
Rosetta Code:Finances For most of Rosetta Code's history, expenses have been paid out of my pocket. I can't afford that much longer, and so you can see the state of Rosetta Code's finances, and how you may help. If you enjoy or are excited about the site, please consider reading through it.

Sorry for the boilerplate; it can be a bit difficult giving an individual greeting to each person. If you post information about your technical interests and background, I'll probably read it. If you already have put that kind of information on your user page, I probably already have; I'm always interested in how people do and can benefit from Rosetta Code. --Michael Mol 18:35, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

No testing in Yorick?[edit]

I noticed you omitted the Yorick language from Test a function‎. That seems strange? --Paddy3118 10:45, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Watching the contributions, I figured he's going for a strict baseline approach first, and avoiding using any extensions, libraries or non-trivial original code. I think that's fine for a first pass; the Omitted tasks still show up on the unimpl page, where someone can then go in and solve them while noting implementation extensions and/or library usage. --Michael Mol 13:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
The task states "If your language does not have a testing specific library well known to the language's community then state this or omit the language." Unfortunately, Yorick does not have a testing library of any kind. The language tests distributed with Yorick do not use any such framework, nor do any of the tests I've seen in external plugins. It'd be plausible to create such a framework in Yorick, but if anyone has done so they haven't made it known. The task seems pretty clear that it isn't looking for original code, so I omitted. -- Sekoia 15:47, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Reasonable, given the circumstance. Just a thought, but the 'omitted tasks' section of the unimple page may be of interest to other Yorick users as an opportunity to find ways to improve the language. --Michael Mol 16:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Sekoia for the clarification. --Paddy3118 17:01, 17 October 2010 (UTC)