User talk:PatGarrett: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
m (Add a timestamp)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi Pat. Just a reminder not to add your name/initials to entries but rely on the pages history to determine authorship as once added, people are encouraged to improve them. Thanks, --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi Pat. Just a reminder not to add your name/initials to entries but rely on the pages history to determine authorship as once added, people are encouraged to improve them. Thanks, --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)


:Hi Paddy. OK, I will follow this piece of advice in the future. In fact, I am really a newbie in RC and I did not know this policy. Is there somewhere some guidelines about the style of programming that RC recommends? For example, about the amount of comments it is nice to insert in the code.
:Hi Paddy. OK, I will follow this piece of advice in the future. In fact, I am really a newbie in RC and I did not know this policy. Is there somewhere some guidelines about the style of programming that RC recommends? For example, about the amount of comments it is nice to insert in the code. --[[User:PatGarrett|PatGarrett]] ([[User talk:PatGarrett|talk]]) 22:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:03, 3 November 2014

Hi Pat. Just a reminder not to add your name/initials to entries but rely on the pages history to determine authorship as once added, people are encouraged to improve them. Thanks, --Paddy3118 (talk) 17:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Paddy. OK, I will follow this piece of advice in the future. In fact, I am really a newbie in RC and I did not know this policy. Is there somewhere some guidelines about the style of programming that RC recommends? For example, about the amount of comments it is nice to insert in the code. --PatGarrett (talk) 22:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)