Anonymous user
User talk:CRGreathouse: Difference between revisions
Nth PARI/GP Output: Thanks
(→Talk:Matrix arithmetic: I left a question there) |
(Nth PARI/GP Output: Thanks) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 72:
==[[Talk:Matrix arithmetic]]==
Hi, I left a question on the task. Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 14:06, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
== Revert of an "incorrect" for PARI/GP Solution to Floyd's Triangle. ==
Hi, I received your message that your reverted the "incorrect" tag I added to the solution, thanks.
Please take a more careful look at the problem, and at the sample output of numerous solutions that get it right.
The last two rows of the example output for the n=14 case show it clearly:
<pre> 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105</pre>
The columns in the solution are all equal width. So in the last row, there are two spaces between the two-digit columns like 93 and 94.
The problem calls for the columns to be packed, rather than of equal width: it states that there is to be one space between the columns in the last row, so the last two rows look like this:
<pre> 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105</pre>
[[User:Kazinator|Kazinator]] ([[User talk:Kazinator|talk]]) 17:49, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
==[[N%27th#PARI.2FGP|Nth PARI/GP Output]]==
If the solution works, can you update all of the output? The %3 line still shows
<pre>"1011st", "1012nd", "1013rd"</pre>
while the %4 shows
<pre>"1012th"</pre>
--[[User:Ooorah|Ooorah]] ([[User talk:Ooorah|talk]]) 15:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
:Thanks for fixing that! --[[User:Ooorah|Ooorah]] ([[User talk:Ooorah|talk]]) 13:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
| |||